SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Zonagen (zona) - good buy?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Dauntless who wrote (2064)1/27/1998 3:59:00 PM
From: Dr. Voodoo  Read Replies (2) of 7041
 
Dauntless,

Went and read J chromatography articles did not copy, no quarters, very grumpy thing :(

What my interpretation of what I read is:

The phentolamine levels they measured in blood were low. I forgot the time points. They did not mention numbers. Go forth and check the patent application. In this chrom. paper they administered a 20 mg dose. Look at Zonagen's own numbers. They indicate that the mean was right around 5 ngs. Also look at the standard deviation. What this says to me irrespective of time points is that you cannot make a reliable determination of phentolamine levels in blood by looking at that paper based on a 20 mg dose. As a result, Zonagen went to higher doses.

Among interesting points I got out of the paper were half life of 19 minutes. Also a bunch of cool words like rapidly metabolized, and conjugated and unconjugated. I am not an analytical chemist, but I have a pretty good understanding what they did to develop their assay. Among the things I still can't quite glean is whether or not they actually measured the metabolite in urine or just said it was difficult. I would be careful in interpreting the urine data, that one is a little tricky.

There was one other reference to an HPLC determination of phentolamine levels down to like 15ng/ml. More on this later, if it pans out.

Regarding Asensio, and lawsuits and other stuff. I do not want to be involved. I don't care about any of this vindictive schmeg. I would advise you to talk to someone who can get a real expert determination of what is going on and don't rely on my chemical or scientific judgement and opinions. (I am not and do not want to be an expert, I just pretend to be one on the internet!) My interpretations of the data are just that, my interpretations, which I have shared with you and others.

Still fetching papers, they're getting popular around here!

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext