SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Cogito who wrote (45874)1/27/1998 4:40:00 PM
From: Gary Wisdom  Read Replies (4) of 58324
 
Allen, in response to your response to me:

If all the information that we have now was made public (as it should have been), you are right: I have no basis for a lawsuit.

BUT, how can you say that KE had no idea of the problems of the company when he sold his stock? Do you know that?

And, how can you say that they did not know of the earnings miss when they split? Do you know that?

And, how can you say the company didn't know before January 23 that they were going to miss? That is unbelievable. Of course they knew. They should have pre-announced. Period.

Regarding KE's performance on the CC, I disagree with you as I do feel his incompetency is a cause of action.

As for the lawsuit being counterproductive, that's your opinion. I guess the verdict will be the ultimate arbiter on this question.

You bet I am angry. And I plan on doing something about it. If you do not plan on doing likewise, that is your option and right.

I guess if I owned 1000 shares, I would not be so upset. But I own quite a bit more than that. As do others on this thread. This is why they have securities laws.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext