SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : SAP A.G.
SAP 241.75+0.7%Nov 28 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Ibexx who wrote (336)1/27/1998 8:56:00 PM
From: Geary Kwong  Read Replies (2) of 3424
 
Three years ago SAP was surpose to list on Nasdaq. Don't know why they didn't but they decided not to. They were to be listed as sapha or saphy or something like that, and were going to trade around $45. Fortune Magazine did a big article on them, and how they are one of the few software companies that msft can not turn into a small profit niche market player.

Like databases, human resource and enterprise resource softwares will slow down or will have slower growth. After a couple of upgrades corporations are going to keep their existing systems when the new system cannot justify its cost. Over 40% of business are still running Windows 3.11 or DOS, because the upgrade to WIN95 and Pentium, do not help them bring that much more productivity out of the workers.

Now that most business have an enterprise resource or human resource system for SAP, PeopleSoft, IBM, Oracle etc, is it worth it for them to continue to upgrade. Like databases is it worthwhile for them to upgrade to the newest version of the database if it does the exact same thing.

As with databases if the margins are fat, msft will go into that market. SQL Server is growing alot faster that IBM's DB2, Oracle 8, or Informix's universal server.

If msft goes into this market that is when the slow down in enterprise systems will occur.

Just my two cents worth of the farm
Geary Kwong
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext