SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : ATPX: Lunn Industries and Technical Products Group merge.

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: DONNAMIKE who wrote (1242)1/27/1998 10:56:00 PM
From: rci   of 1923
 
Michael,
I apoligize for not replying, I just missed your message somehow. I'm not sure what it's going to take to get ATP to get more "investor oriented". I don't think they were prepared for "the interest investors take in their investments". In my opinion they wanted the money investors afford them but not the headaches of being questioned or scrutinized. Now, I may be totally wrong about this but I'm going to have to take the investors side on this issue.
Tomorrow will be one week since I e-mailed some of the questions I had seen posted here, to ATP. I'm not sure what an appropriate timetable would be to answer that many questions. Although they seemed straight forward to me, the company might view some or all as "none of my business". I'm not the best at posing questions as I'm a very black and white sort of person. It might have served us all better if I had let someone more tactful ask questions. Another thing that might be causing an answer to take longer is the fact that I asked in print. However, if I had received a phone call, I would have had to tape it to remember all of what was said. By the time I relayed the message, it would have been so screwed up, I'd have been tarred and feathered. Again, I apoligize for the delay in answering your mail. I'll be sure to post the message if I receive one back from ATP. JR
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext