2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum

GLD 374.35

+0.7%

Nov 18 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

Recommended by:

bull_dozer

ggersh

Pogeu Mahone

To: TobagoJack who wrote (160443)	7/22/2020 8:39:42 AM
From: Horgad	3 Recommendations Read Replies (1) of 217867

Fed are in the drivers seat as usual. The US will HAVE to take their medicine after their long heavy, binging, but which one(s) will the Feds choose for us? A. Stop stimulus: Deflation as massive corporate and personal bankruptcies ensue and zillions in debts go poof. B. Stimulate only the top: Stagflation as Joe Sixpack's wages and job opportunities stagnate while the rich snatch up all assets coughed up by Joe while prices in most things rise. C. Stimulate everything: Inflation as Joe Sixpack and everyone else keeps churning the free money I long suspect the playback was Deflation followed by Stagflation or Inflation, but at the moment it appears this time around the Feds seem determined to avoid A at all costs. S o B or C? Right now it is tilted towards B and there seems to be some resistance from the whitehouse to another of stimulate everything. The "All in gold" option that you mention is starting to look more and more like a "no choice" option instead of a risky, ill advised, venture.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next