2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum

GLD 385.99

+1.6%

Nov 12 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Snowshoe who wrote (161530)	8/22/2020 5:15:39 AM
From: TobagoJack	Read Replies (1) of 217737

Wonderful news that the project is politicised as issues about jobs jobs jobs always ready-weaponised So, never mind the environmental issues, which are phooey as gold mining can be clean when done right, and milling same, and cyanide ... well, cyanide degrades in the sun Can see the headlines now, "Rich Elite Group Intervenes to Keep Poor Disadvantage Native American Domain As Private Playground" "Living Requires Working" "Whose Gold?" "Schooling Requires Money" "Future Requires Now" "Fed was going to create 300 jobs in Rochester by funding Eastman Kodak managed by could-be criminals, but acts to destroy opportunity for $300 billion in Alaska" ... and as a college buddy's father back in 1980 obtained permission to develop a quarry w/I a line of sight mile of second home of Sierra Club president, am certain a gold project can get approval in the middle of nowhere as economic reality of unaffordable depression dawns in folks mind. NAK does not need permission to develop the Pebble mine. NAK only needs to be kept volatile, as it itself is a cloud-ATM bank. Nothing needs to happen to the environment. Nothing needs to happen at all. So, besides the management and shareholders, who is for the mine?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next