SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum
GLD 387.98+1.3%Nov 28 4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Cogito Ergo Sum who wrote (161890)8/29/2020 11:15:28 PM
From: stuffbug1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Pogeu Mahone

  Read Replies (2) of 218083
 
7 shots - yes, everyone questions the number, including me.
But I am also in favor of letting the process play out - no rush to judgment.
The officer was issued a semi automatic hand gun - doesn't take much time to fire off 7 rounds, especially when you are pumped with adrenaline.

As for the law, there is no limit on the number of shots.
If an officer believes his life is at risk, then he is legally allowed to use his weapon to eliminate the danger (shoot to kill).
Don't like that law, then don't fight with cops, resist arrest or disobey their commands.

For those interested, here is a very smart lawyer's early account of the incident (very close to the police union statement on Friday) and discussion of the law.
redstate.com

Note 1: this guy is meticulous about facts and legal nuances – former prosecutor and defense attorney.

Note 2: outstanding warrant for sexual assault - Blake was not an innocent bystander getting into his car.

Warning: SWC does write from a right wing perspective

As noted above, the Kenosha Police Union issued a statement on Friday, providing a few more details.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext