SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Dino's Bar & Grill

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Goose94 who wrote (93316)9/3/2020 11:52:22 AM
From: Goose94Read Replies (1) of 202731
 
Gold: over bonds is a 'no-brainer'

If they dig deep enough into it today, readers of the Financial Times will find support for gold at the bottom of senior editor John Plender's column, headlined "Fed's Inflation Shift Is Another Blow to 'Safe' Assets":

ft.com

Plender writes: "... it is striking that government bonds this year have no longer been reliably providing relief when stocks fall. Since the start of the pandemic there have been times when the prices of equities and bonds have gone down together. So the notion of carrying a portion of safe fixed-interest assets to balance riskier equity holdings is now suspect.

"This continues a broader theme: As central banks have pumped liquidity into markets through vast bond-purchase programs since the financial crisis, different asset classes have tended to move more uniformly. Fundamentals no longer matter for the overall market indices. ...

"It seems counterintuitive to think of equities as safe. But equally, it is hard to believe that government bonds yielding little or nothing are not a hostage to fortune when central banks are working overtime to generate higher inflation. For long-term investors this boils down to choosing between governmental paper promises and real assets such as property, commodities, and gold. It is, in the time-honored phrase, a no-brainer."

Of course if Plender's analysis is correct, he has just ratified the old and powerful rationale for the longstanding Western government policy of surreptitious intervention in the gold market -- to protect the value of government currencies and bonds.

But in acknowledging that government intervention in markets has canceled fundamentals and that gold should do well when interest rates are minimal or negative, Plender's column is probably the closest the FT, mouthpiece of the financial establishment, can get to economic reality. Putting a critical question to any central bank and reporting the bank's refusal to answer is still far beyond the newspaper's journalistic capacity.

Chris Powell, Secretary/Treasurer
Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee Inc.
CPowell@GATA.org
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext