>>>>>Subj: RMIL
Date: 98-01-29 12:42:45 EST
From: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
To: pugstko@AOL.COM ('pugstko@aol.com')
Pugs,
I suppose that I am an official "lurker". I do not have an SI
membership but I have got to express my opinion in some way. This
thread could use the opinion of someone who has not been caught up in
the latest battles between the "nays" and "yeas". My viewpoint is that
of a person who still believes in the same fundamentals that started
this squeeze. The following is my opinion and you may post any or all
of it.
I've been reading this thread since September '97 and can't believe what
I've seen happen to, what I thought were, several smart investors. This
squeeze began based on the belief that there is a large undeclared short
position in this stock. The productivity of the company was not an
issue, only that it is legal and does exist. The goal was, and still
is, to buy shares, call in the certificates, and cause the illegal
shorts to cover at the prices we are willing to sell for. Everything
was going well until, ironically enough, our solid proof of a short
position came in the form of "around the clock bashing from nay-sayers.
When they came aboard, It was obvious that the "shorts" were in big
trouble and they knew it. Let me tell you this. Nobody, and I mean
nobody comes aboard a little known stock like this one and tries to
convince people around the clock to get out while they still can, just
because they are looking out for the small investor. Very few would
come aboard and bash the stock just to make a name for themselves, and
fewer yet would come aboard and bash the stock because they are against
you or Riley. It is near impossible that 10 to 20 nay sayers would come
on board for a combination of these reasons. It's obvious, unless you
are an idiot or a trembling coward, who is easily shaken, that these nay
sayers are in it for one reason; to stop what appears to be a cartel
headed for a successful short squeeze that will hurt them financially.
The problem is that when they started to bash the company's credentials,
some of the very weak (Matty Dee for example) panicked and ran. These
"weak" want to blame the company, you, or Riley for their losses when in
fact, they are the very people who gave up cheap shares and induced the
drop in price. They forgot that only one thing mattered, The
Certificates in hand count! We are now in a position where all of the
weak should be gone. Everyone who reads this thread knows without a
doubt why the nay sayers are here and how positive it is for us that
they are here in such force. The company is real and I don't give a
d*mn whether the new sight is ahead or behind schedule, whether or not
the $10,000,000 is early or late, whether the press releases are
positive or negative or any of that crap. All that matters to us is
that we buy, call for certs, and force the undeclared shorts to cover.
Let the nays ramble amongst themselves all they want. Their presence is
an absolute positive to our cause. Our posts need to concentrate on the
certs, not defending the company. Let the nays drive out the weak, or
those in for a quick dollar. I am in until the shorts buy my shares for
a starting price of $50.00 per share and not a penny less. It will
happen! I've never been more sure than now.
You are an inspiration to us all and I hope that you and Riley continue
to lead us in our quest for what is right, not just for RMIL, but for
all of the stocks out there that were illegally shorted.
Thanks for your time,
XXXXXXXX<<<<<<<
__________________________________
Pugs |
