Frosty, Vivus-short staredown in progress. Stock held up pretty good yesterday. Today, LOW volume again. IMHO, the longs don't want to part and the shorts will be carried away ( to the poorhouse?gg) screaming and yelling. Almost a parallel to the present White House position.Speaking of which I want to enlarge the theme. George Step-on-all-of-us last Sunday on the Sam & Cokie show said that " Bill & Hillary will not give up and that they will have to be carried away ".
I think that will apply to our shorts here. An ugly sight I am afraid.
However another issue comes up that I feel may need to be addressed. I need to warn some people that this is adult material and so any children need to be removed from this thread now.
The reason I want to talk about this issue is because I am a Vivus
long investor, with an interest therefore in the field of erectile dysfunction which is what affects VIvus sales. OK we settled that.
What i am referring to is the issue of potential ED in the White House.Touchy subject I know. Here are my thoughts though and PLEASE CORRECT me if I am wrong.
I heard in one of the talk shows or maybe TV that one of the things Paula Jones testified to was that she ALLEGED that when she went into the Prez's room in the Hotel in Arkansas ," he dropped his pants " and she said " it looked horizontal but curving down ". " He then " she alleges " asked her to kiss it ". Now to me, as a hard nosed physician, this appearance,the abscence of a hard erection, is highly suspicious of ED, erectile dysfunction. OK , maybe I am making too much of this. But wait a minute, and also correct me if I am wrong: didn't we hear on TV that in the Monica affair that the only kind of sex being asked " from a person in the White House was oral sex? ( which is why of course " there was no improper sex in the White House " I suppose: oral sex does not meat the strict definition of SEXUAL INTERCOURSE ( ie penetration) which is how most people would define it, and therefore oral sex, not being improper, by a logical exclusionary leap ( of faith) must be proper and so OK.But htis is a diversion. Back to the subject.
What I am trying to say is this: should I, be suspicious at this time that somebody with a bent penis, who needs oral sex for gratification ( in this case unfortunately, ALLEGEDLY, outside the bounds of marital bliss ),suffers from ED?
Is there ED in the White House?
The reason that this is important from a VIvus investment viewpoint, and I am finally coming to my point, is that the Vivus AD campaign is about to take off. It will be all over the media. As the sordid details of this " as the oral sex turns " soap opera unfurl, are people going to start connecting possible ED in the White House with Vivus providing a therapy for that? And if so, will that help boost the stock price, to , " irrationally exuberant levels?".Is that when I should consider selling Vius for short term gain, and then hopefully buy it back when the irrational exuberance disappears?( the caveat in that htough is that if the irrational exuberance does not die down I'll be left out of a susequent siginificant rise in Vivus stock.So may be I should hold for long term, ? $100).
I am just asking the question here and I would appreciate any comments on this potential clinical insight.
TA |
