SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Rarebird who wrote (1267297)10/7/2020 7:18:22 PM
From: Tenchusatsu2 Recommendations

Recommended By
Mick Mørmøny
TideGlider

  Read Replies (1) of 1577053
 
OK Rarebird, let's take a look at her judicial positions:
In 2018, Barrett was among the 7th Circuit judges who sought reconsideration of a decision that invalidated a Republican-backed Indiana law requiring that fetal remains be buried or cremated after an abortion. The Supreme Court in 2019 reinstated the law.
There are no details given as to why she wanted that law reinstated. There are also no details given as to why the law was invalidated in the first place.

The burden of proof is on you. You need to tell me why the law was unconstitutional and why Barrett's support for the law demonstrates that she prioritizes faith over the Constitution.
In 2019, Barrett also voted for rehearing of a three-judge panel’s ruling that upheld a challenge to another Republican-backed Indiana abortion law before it went into effect. The measure would require that parents be notified when a girl under 18 is seeking an abortion even in situations in which she has asked a court to provide consent instead of her parents, as was allowed under existing law. The Supreme Court in July tossed out the ruling and ordered the matter to be reconsidered.
Again, no details. You haven't proven anything.
In June, Barrett dissented when a three-judge panel ruled in favor of a challenge to Trump’s policy to deny legal permanent residency to certain immigrants deemed likely to require government assistance in the future. In January, the Supreme Court, powered by its conservative majority, allowed the policy to take effect.
Still no details. You might not like Trump's immigration policy. I don't either. But it seems the president has the power to shape immigration policy in this manner. If you don't like it, you're free to vote for the party of open borders.
And she is a member of "People of Praise", which is a semi-secret Catholic Society and has an authoritarian structure.
LOL, and now the conspiracy theories come out.

Clever people, those "semi-secret Catholic authoritarians" ...

Tenchusatsu
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext