| Most of the news today is about the "theater" of American  politics.  Biden blasts Trump for "dealing with thugs"... which (even  ignoring the obvious in the Biden pay-to-play scandals now unfolding)  doesn't mean he's going to refuse to deal with the same thugs ?    Does  anyone alive really believe being "Trump's good friend" is overly  meaningful, or a good thing, for Xi, or Kim Jong Il ?  Anyway... 
 The  theater sustains the fiction that Biden has a snowballs chance in hell  of "winning" this election.   Currently, only 6% of voters are left  undecided..  They'll be deciding in context of the first round of Hunter  Biden revelations, already out, and the next couple, apparently yet to  drop.  I haven't checked the news for updates, yet, today...
 
 Voting  has already started, though.  So there are already trends in data  emerging, in a couple venues, that are not all that hard to parse.    Last cycle, in the early mail in voting, Hillary led Trump in Texas by  20%, and still lost Texas by that same margin.  In 2020, in the same  metrics, Trump leads Biden by 10%, suggesting Trump, in Texas, is  beating Biden even in the votes cast by the core group of Democrats  voters.
 
 The external polls are working on  shedding their deliberate pro-Biden biases, now, hoping to end up being  not be "too far" off when the results are tallied, and still hoping the  bias adopted makes it look like "its close" as election day nears. But,  its not close. The media "influence" operations are back-firing, now,  with the Streisand Effect amplifying public impacts of recent  "unhelpful" news as it is censored... by a biased media.
 
 What  the internal polls show, is a massive differential in motivation.   Biden is not winning Democrats votes... not inspiring anyone...  particularly not the core groups of swing voters that are essential to a  win... the youth vote... who are simply opting out of participation.   Trump has Republican voters wound up and enthusiastic.  Republicans are  expanding the base to include traditional Democrat constituencies:   Latino, Asian and Black voters are all voting Republican in record high  numbers.   None of that should be a surprise... to anyone paying  attention.  Trump's rallies are well attended, upbeat, contagiously  enthusiastic, and hugely positive in tone... actually FUN.  Biden, when  he does get out, can't draw a crowd.  In his appearances, Biden is about  as charismatic, enthusiastic, positive in tone, and appealing... as  Eeyore.  Layer in well justified concern with his fitness... constant  gaffes... and the breaking news with emerging proof of corruption... ?
 
 Other massive shifts occurring  matter even more than made apparent in the early returns.  Democrats  registrations are down by 8%... while the Republicans are up a couple  percent... a really significant impact occurring in the underlying  "affiliation shifts"... which are highly correlative with future changes  in voting patterns.   You don't leave the party, much less switch  parties... and then vote for those guys you just left.
 
 Shifting  loyalties indicate changes more significant than just the impact on the  next election. That metric is far and away the most predictive of  current AND future election results... it not being shown wrong in  predicting any past election, ever, when there are shifts of the type  and magnitude occurring now.
 
 Part of that is  clearly attributable to the Democrats enablement, support and advocacy  of the "protest" violence.  The BLM/Antifa issues, with Democrats  overtly saying "vote for us if you want the violence to stop"... a  massive misjudgement of the character of American voters... had already  ensured Democrats loss long ago... unless Republicans somehow went even  more stupid... which they haven't.  Democrats belated effort to  "stop"... when the polling turned against them in result... wasn't  matched by any policy reversals... so the trend sustained an  accelerating pace in abandonment of the Democrats by centrist voters.   In the cities, de-funding the police... proceeds into practice... even  though 80% of voters oppose it ?
 
 Democrats  strategy shift to use directed mail-in votes with changed "rules" to  enable partisan advantages, even if hoping to win a massive early lead  among dead voters... appears it is failing.  Democrats do tend to vote  by mail, and vote early... but, their voters just aren't cooperating:  they're not turning out.   Not only is the count of votes voted, in the  venues that do count the votes as they arrive, not going their way...  there aren't enough of them coming in to enable them to turn it around.   If the trend proves different in states that don't count as the votes  arrive... you'd have to explain why ?  The total of early votes coming  in is smaller... and the percentage of those votes won by Democrats is  smaller... while the clocks ticking are working strongly against  Democrats.  How many "mail  in" votes can they be "holding back"... to  try to create dynamic post election day shifts in the count  ?    Probably not enough to matter in current context... and, then, only at  some significant risk of running afoul of the laws.
 
 The  registration shifts, and the number of Democrats changing parties and  voting Trump... today has the Democrats percentage of the total vote  shrinking each day the early voting continues.... losing another 1% to  2% today alone... already down by a couple percentage points in both  Ohio and Florida... trending down in parallel in North Carolina... and  that's all before the Republicans core group of voters even start  voting... as the Republicans do still tend to vote, in person, and on  election day.
 
 Odds are... trusting in the  other metrics far more than polls... not only does Trump win  re-election "handily"... it looks more and more like he does so in a  "Red Wave" election... with significant coat-tail effects.
 
 Democrats  options for preventing that occurring... narrowing down to trying to  disrupt the mail, or stage other disruptions... trying to steal the  election by continuing to produce "votes" long after the election is  over... or trying to disrupt the "count" to prevent a result, or even by  refusing to accept the outcome.  They've made it clear enough some of  that is what they're planning... but haven't made it clear the effort  will have any positive impact, other than likely ending their own voters  trust in them, permanently... while destroying their brand.  Any of  those sorts of efforts, to convince anyone, and then succeed, would  depend on first "making it appear close" in fact... which is pretty hard  to do in the face of a landslide election, with your own voters voting  against you... as you'd need more votes than there are voters just to  "get close" ?   But, it would also depend on people accepting that  "close" result was real, and a natural event... and not a function of  manipulations of process... which is much harder to achieve, when you're  telling people how it is you intend to deliver that result... without  getting more people to vote for you.   Then, the last element in the  play book... more violence... which, while likely to occur, is a big  part of why people are voting against them.
 
 For  foreign observers, the focus shifts from "will Trump win"... to  considering the nature of a second Trump term... and how it might change  dramatically from the first term... as the constraint of Democrats  persistent efforts in obstruction, tolerated in the first term,  are  removed... in part by the election result, and the voters mandate... and  in part by an acceleration in post-election accountability.
 |