2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum

GLD 386.01

+1.6%

Nov 12 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

Recommended by:

3bar

To: Snowshoe who wrote (164311)	10/26/2020 10:11:49 AM
From: TobagoJack	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) of 217734

Hello Snowshoe, I apologize, profusely, and am very sorry, and may be sorrier, that I was compelled to and just did re-engage w/ NAK. The profit last go @ 48% Message 32991982 realized only 7 nights ago long forgotten, and fidget-fidget call of duty for one more extraction was too absurd to pass up Bought NAK at 1.015 per share, and Received rebates by way of short calls @ 0.40 per share Received bonus wager credit by way of short puts @ 0.40 per share So the net net plucking net of re-engagement was 0.21 per share If I am called 19th February, I make 80% If I am put that day, my cost basis for the entire bundle would be ~0.60 per share (and I get to sell calls against the bundle once more. Who can know, maybe the Trump wins, and Pebble gets the go-ahead. In any case, once is not enough. Over the past 5-years the lowest NAK touched was 0.35 per share finance.yahoo.com

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next