SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum
GLD 395.890.0%Dec 16 4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: ggersh who wrote (164468)10/29/2020 5:00:03 PM
From: TobagoJack1 Recommendation

Recommended By
ggersh

  Read Replies (1) of 218540
 
For completeness I am posting below the article you cited.

(1) It is a somewhat complicated issue, in that I am guessing, policy-wise, ...

(1-i) cannot throw people out on to the street and expect no ill consequences

(1-ii) cannot cut off sustenance to landlords (presumably majority are ‘small landlords’) and allow their savings to vaporize by way of mortgage foreclosures

(1-iii) cannot cut off flow to banks without causing more of problems (1-i) and (1-ii), which loops right back here (1-iii)

(2) Answer, socialize losses, again, as difficult to draw the line between those ‘truly’ deserving and those best sacrificed to the money gods

(3) Keep doing (2) as a habitual response to losses leads to more behavior encouraging still more losses

(4) ...

(5) Here in HK the banks do not lend more than 50% LTV on real estate as a constant rule, full stop.

(5-i) At peak-esque times, LTV for new mortgage drops to 30%

(5-ii) Given absence of capital gains tax, the RE market is very liquid. Whilst not as liquid as blue-chip stocks, one can sell a property w/i a day - just meet the highest of bidding price (peculiarity of the market is that most properties on sale are units w/i large buildings, and there are price-discovering transactions frequently)

(5-iii) Landlords decide eviction vs rent-reduction negotiation route based on assessment of cost of vacancy, merit of tenant, etc - a business decision, but accounting for societal macro. IOW do not kick out a tenant wishing for rent forbearance if unable to quickly find a tenant paying same, especially during unusual times w/ disaster happenings.

Rule #2, do not lose tenant.

Rule #1, go light on debt.

The property club I organized and am in charge of policy-wise, and sign checks for, is doing okay.

We are paying out the same dividend next month for 2020 as we always did since inception, at ~97% of revenue. Because of past laziness in distributing excess above the 97%, we are able to maintain payout at the same amount as last year. No sweat.

We have never had structural debt, and only bridging debt in the past.

We took a 14% discount (on portfolio basis) on rent, have not lost a single tenant, and shall be able to immediately revert to old rent levels the minute we can, whilst have full freedom to evict (should we choose to sell the property tenant-free, or rid of troublesome tenant).

We are dialogue going amongst the shareholders of which I am 45% w/r to taking on leverage to buy more. I am indifferent at the moment and nothing can happen w/o my thumbs up.

I am pondering, because what I do for myself in the financial market I ought to be able to do for the property club (it started at the get-go as a corporate entity w/ its on wrap account) - shorting TSLA and long GBTC / DRD and and and - but why?

In the meantime, no evictions necessary, and no laws against evictions called for.

No socialism and no anti-socialism. Just good business.

At this juncture, if I owned rental property in California as I once did, I would be nervous, and cut price to sell, to exit whilst exit still good.

If Trump wins, a landlord of any size may count on a new day of uncertainty, and maybe get bailed out along with everybody else.

If Biden wins, I may also count on a new day of uncertainty, and maybe get bailed out; but ...

But if Biden wins, Trump might just do a scorched-earth protocol between 1st January 2021 and February moving day, to deliberately leave Biden a hard-to-manage and total mess.

Thankfully Trump is a real estate man and may pause before doing something stupid to the real estate market, unless he is cashed-up and wanting to buy.

Which ever side loses next week (or the coming 60 days) is going to have a difficult 2021-2024. Whichever side wins, have a different but also difficult 2021-2024. Just a guess.

nakedcapitalism.com

Residential Evictions Bearing Down on Many Tenants

Yves Smith
October 28, 2020
As we’ve been saying on several fronts, winter is coming, and that includes the January 1 expiration of the Presidential order barring residential evictions. If Trump loses next week’s election, he presumably wont’ extend it even the few weeks to the end of his term, and Biden has not made any noise about taking measures to keep people who’ve suffered income hits under Covid housed.

And if Team Dem’s fallback is a stimulus bill under Biden, good luck with that. It’s unlikely that citizens would get cash before early March, and even that charitably assumes the relief would be large enough to make up for months of no or inadequate income. Nolo provides a summary of each state’s eviction laws; you can see they are all short-trigger.

And that’s before getting to the fact that the CDC eviction moratorium wasn’t comprehensive (for instance, it didn’t address month-to-month rentals) and that it calls on tenants to make attestations, which some landlords are challenging. From MarketWatch last week:

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s nationwide eviction ban has been in effect for nearly two months — but landlords and tenants alike are still trying to figure out how the moratorium works and what protections it offers…

The moratorium’s protections were not granted automatically to all tenants. Instead, renters essentially have to opt in by notifying their landlord with a signed affidavit that they cannot afford their full monthly rental payments…..

Because renters need to be proactive to receive protection under the moratorium, those who don’t do so can still face eviction. Since the moratorium was first announced in early September, the country has seen nearly 9,500 eviction filings by private-equity firms and other corporate landlords, according to data from the Private Equity Stakeholder Project. These represent filings in just five states: Arizona, Texas, Tennessee, Georgia and Florida.

And the number has trended up recently — in the week ending Oct. 16 there were nearly 2,000 eviction cases filed, which was nearly double the number from the previous two weeks.

New guidance from the Trump administration suggests that even tenants who fill out the required affidavit could be taken to court by their landlord.

Even so, it appears that most renters in arrears are getting a stay of execution until January, where the prospects for landlords giving relief don’t look great. As the Wall Street Journal reports, a lot of tenants are already borrowing on their credit cards to try to keep from falling too far behind. Yet given the way Covid-19 has hit broad swathes of middle and lower income workers, such as restaurant and hotel employees, trainers, beauty salon operators and owners, it’s not clear how evicting landlords expect to find creditworthy replacements, even at lower rental levels. From the Journal:

A large number of renters have been unable to pay some or even all of their rent since March, when the pandemic temporarily shut down most businesses. Many businesses remain closed or only partially open, pushing renters into unemployment and draining their savings….

A study of unemployed workers released last week by the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia calculated outstanding rent debt would reach $7.2 billion before the close of 2020. Moody’s Analytics estimates that it could reach nearly $70 billion by year-end if there is no additional stimulus spending. The economic-research firm calculated that 12.8 million Americans would then owe an average of $5,400 from missed payments.

Even the larger figure would be far less than what was lost when the $1.3 trillion subprime-mortgage bubble burst, leading to a national wave of defaults and foreclosures. But the tens of millions of people potentially caught in a web of home-rental debt and eviction would far exceed the 3.8 million homeowners who were foreclosed on in 2007-2010.

Another difference is that the foreclosure crisis played out over time. Some foreclosures were triggered early on by resets of subprime “teaser” loans, which were intended to trigger a refi, but none were to be had after the subprime market shut and housing prices were falling, particularly in the Sunbelt states that saw the frothiest lending. More defaults followed as a result of financial crisis job losses or cuts in hours.

Moreover, foreclosures proceeded at different speeds in different states. Generally speaking, in “title theory” states, the lender holds the deed until the final payment is made. There’s thus no need for a title transfer to execute a foreclosure; the typical process is to notify the borrower and advertise. In lien theory or judicial foreclosures states, by contrast, the borrower has the title to the property but the bank has a lien on the home. The lender thus needs to go to court to foreclose, which takes more time.

And a final factor that spread foreclosures out was the Treasury’s half-hearted rescue efforts, which Treasury Secretary Geithner told SIGTARP chief Neil Barofsky was intended to “foam the runway” for banks as opposed to help homeowners.

By contrast, unless Something Happens before January 1, and that seems unlikely, evictions will start full bore in the new year. Back to the Journal:

But about a quarter of American renter households with children are now carrying debt from not paying rent, U.S. Census Bureau surveys show…

Mounting rental debt could also impede the path to a U.S. economic recovery, when 30 million to 40 million people from New York City to San Francisco face potential eviction once moratoriums expire….

In the early weeks of the pandemic, many renters tried to scrape together their rent by borrowing money from friends or family. Some moved to credit cards, which could mean the total debt tied to rent is greater than what can be counted from missed payments alone.

Credit payments to small and medium-size businesses connected to rental real estate increased by more than 70% in the spring, according to the Philadelphia Federal Reserve. The data showed that through the fall these payments have remained some 50% higher than during the same period in 2019….

Other renters falling behind are now on payment plans arranged with their landlords, allowing them to pay small minimum amounts each month. Some landlords are charging punitive late fees on top of what is already owed, making the debt higher than just the face value of the rent.

The article adds that many landlords won’t forgive the amounts owed and will seek to garnish wages and assets.

The Journal comments section was disheartening. Even though there were some who advocated for sharing the pain, the “hate the poors” remarks were vicious. For instance:

Howard S
Single mothers are suddenly discovering why its good to have a responsible husband who works and supports his family before you start making babies. Bad decisions have bad consequences.

Richard B

The government, especially an agency like the CDC, has no business dictating the terms of private real estate contracts!

It’s called Capitalism. Save for a rainy day and don’t buy that 75 inch LED 4K TV or lease a brand new car.

Others pointed out collateral damage of the moratoriums (scarcity of rentals in some areas due to lack of turnover as tenants stayed in place) and the reluctance of landlords to accept reduced rents despite the collapse in incomes in their market.

But more serious is the lack of willingness to discuss this looming train wreck, let alone build consensus around policy proposals. Unless something changes, the level of evictions that appears likely for 2021 will be greater than anything the US has seen since the Great Depression. The CDC invoked public health powers for a reason. Homeless living on the streets or in encampments with no or few toilets and showers is a great way to propagate more disease, like hepatitis A and B, tuberculosis, and typhus.

But the Democrats, as they did with the foreclosure crisis, seem to think the solution to every problem is better PR. So perhaps they’ve persuaded themselves that if members of the press don’t pay much attention to millions being turfed out of their dwellings by Covid-caused loss of income, they can pretend it isn’t happening.

Sent from my iPad
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext