COMS & the Ghost of USRX w/ other STUFF Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : COMS & the Ghost of USRX w/ other STUFF

COMS 0.00130

-87.0%

Nov 7 11:47 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Glenn D. Rudolph who wrote (12201)	1/30/1998 3:44:00 PM
From: Bill Ulrich	Read Replies (3) of 22053

Glenn, re: new .whatever What they should add is .sex The public and government is concerned about children, porn, and access. The current filters such as CyberSitter and NetNanny use a database of keywords and domain names to be effective. But this isn't the most effective method as it has to be constantly updated and some get missed. Simply having a .sex would allow you to specifically filter out anything with this parameter&#151piece of cake. The porn industry would probably go along with this. They already are somewhat self-policing but that doesn't approach 100% effectiveness. Being allowed complete business freedom by adopting .sex, which is easily filtered, is a smart and easy choice for them. Less legal hassles for them, more effective protection for kids. Everybody wins. JMHIdea -MrB

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next