SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Apple Inc.
AAPL 271.50+2.0%Nov 21 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bill Jackson who wrote (8078)1/30/1998 7:12:00 PM
From: Mark Dalton  Read Replies (1) of 213173
 
I agree here that the price of a PC and Mac need to be comparable.
And I think the Mac G3 at $2K is very similar compared to a "$1K"
Wintel (plus memory, plus monitor, plus...).

Perhaps the multi-vendor made CPUs would help Apple have higher
margins and lower prices also.

I think the real problem is lack of standards, lack of software
(at the same time). If the computer industry could agree, as
has been done for years in the Unix world. This would make it
easier for Adobe, Alias|WaveFront, Claris, etc. To write one
application and not require EXTENSIVE porting to get it to work
on each other computer.

Standards like:
C/C++ - The standard version
GUI - X11, Motif, OpenGL, or a new standard
System calls - Low/medium level library to call
so developers would not need to rewrite the
codes so it could be on EACH platform.

Basically if you write a code on a $1k Intel with Linux (GUI
and all) it will run on any Unix machine, from $1,000 to highend
Crays. That is portability, and this is what I see as needed
from Mac, MicroSoft and the Unix world. (that is a OPEN
standard for all applications interfaces... API from calls to a GUI).
(GUI = Graphical User Interface).

Mark
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext