| | | Thanks for the info. I like Technology Review and have read article in it frequently. I also like the discussion of how survey questions and weighting in your samples can skew results so they can't be extrapolated to the population. We saw that in spades when the Democrats used flawed polls that oversampled Democrats by 10% to claim that Biden had a 10%+ lead over Trump during campaign season, only to see that lead dwindle to nothing after the election. I examined the assumptions of some of those polls and spotted the flaws immediately. But most Americans don't have the education to do that.
I do find it funny that anytime a person on the left doesn't like what is being said, they label it "conspiracy theory" or "Russian disinformation". Therefore, I take that with a grain of salt. I don't trust most media sources, because most so-called journalist don't do empirical research anymore, but rather, they regurgitate what they read from other source journals like New York Times, CNN, and other MSM sources and then claim those as empirical. Those sources don't do empirical research either, but they cite other "anonymous sources", which almost always turn out to be biased government leakers, such as members of the DNC or members of biased government agencies like the FBI who are goal seeking outcomes. In other words, most of what you see or read is simply propaganda.
Therefore, I usually try to find empirical sources like court filings, affidavits, video surveillance, etc. Those sources on the fraud in this election are absolutely damning. There is no question there was widespread fraud, and the fraud was especially egregious in swing counties in swing states. The overwhelming nature of the fraud in those counties and the preponderance of the evidence is in favor of a coordinated attack on our election processes. For me to believe there was no fraud or that the fraud was not enough to swing the outcome, I would have to believe in a number of coincidences across such a large number of things all favoring Biden that itself would constitute a conspiracy theory of coincidences. A fundamental principle that all statisticians understand is Occam's razor. If a theory has too many assumption that all must be true, then the theory becomes less probable. Said another way, the simplest explanation is the one that is most highly probable.
I suggest you watch the hearings, read the affidavits and court filings, and watch the surveillance videos. If the Democrats did not steal this election, then they should have no problem allowing a forensic audit and access to the Dominion servers. Instead, they are fighting that tooth and nail and in one case in Fulton County, they deliberately wiped the servers clean. Smartmatic was the software used by Chavez to steal his elections and Dominion bought that company. Dominion is now the largest provider of election hardware and servers across the USA. In addition, all the swing counties in all the swing states stopped counting the night of the election, which has never happened before in my lifetime. Then they all miraculously had data dumps in the middle of the night, which swung 98% for Biden. First, why did they stop counting? To tally the Biden deficit, of course. How is it possible that Trump had a higher margin of incoming votes, but then miraculously the overnight found votes in the data dump were 98% for Biden? Statistically improbable to say the least. Why are Democrats fighting against an audit and investigation? Why? What are they trying to hide? The true conspiracy theory here is that this election was fair. That takes a lot of incredulous belief against an overhwhelming amount of evidence to the contrary. Where there is smoke, there is usually fire. This election stinks to high heaven. If Biden was confident that the election was not stolen, he would be demanding an audit himself with GOP oversight to PROVE he won. Instead, he has gone silent, as he did his entire campaign. And this doesn't even mention the Social Media companies tilting the political discourse massively in favor of Biden, including censoring of the Hunter Biden laptop news that showed smoking gun proof of corruption linked to Joe Biden.
So we are expected to believe that a man who barely even campaigned and was the least popular candidate in the Dem primary, and definitely less popular than Obama, somehow managed to beat the most popular GOP Presidential candidate since Reagan? So unlikely as to be laughable. |
|
