SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
Recommended by:
Lance Bredvold
Nya_Quy
To: RetiredNow who wrote (65609)12/6/2020 5:04:40 PM
From: petal2 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) of 78817
 
I'm far more comfortable with gold, given its 5,000 history.
Very reasonable reasoning. However, I can't help being skeptical of gold's current price. Gold cost around $19 per ounce in 1914. Today, it's close to $2000. In comparison, 19 dollars in 1914, in today's money, is equivalent to around $500. Gold looks a little like a growth stock to me currently – sure, the debasing of currencies may make that warranted, but it still looks inflated to me. Remember, there is always a well-sounding explanation for why something is expensive – still, expensive is expensive though.

That being said, I own gold and silver too, as I've mentioned before. If one needs insurance, one buys it even if the price of insurance may seem a little steep.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext