Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

Recommended by:

To: i-node who wrote (734211)	12/7/2020 8:00:20 AM
From: skinowski	4 Recommendations Read Replies (2) of 793781

Mark Levin made an interesting point (among others). Pa Constitution states that changing election law requires an amendment to the state constitution. That was not done. Therefore, the decision of the heavily partisan state Supreme Court in favor of massive mail vote is in violation of the state constitution - which represents a violation of the federal Constitution. So, if the SCOTUS takes on this case, which they should, they will likely decide in favor of invalidating the outcome of PA vote, and have their legislature make the decision about electors.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next