Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: locogringo who wrote (734354)	12/8/2020 4:49:51 PM
From: carranza2	4 Recommendations Recommended By Bruce L locogringo Maple MAGA rdkflorida2 Read Replies (3) of 793800

The S. Ct. is the only court in which a State can sue another State. It has to take the case. What the Court will do with it, who knows. It is a gnarly issue, but my initial thought is that Texas’s standing to complain about another State’s election procedures will be the focus of the case. I’m not so sure Texas has standing. The Constitution specifically provides for the States to run their own elections. The issue will be whether Texas has the right to claim that other States’ procedures were improper. How does Texas intend to prove its case before the Electoral College meets? The precedent if Texas is allowed to go forward would be unbelievable. Every Presidential election would be contested with States suing each other. We’ll see. It’s an interesting legal maneuver, but I wouldn’t get too excited about Texas’s chances of prevailing. I wish it were otherwise but, realistically speaking, I have my doubts.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next