SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: D. Long who wrote (734360)12/8/2020 5:18:29 PM
From: carranza28 Recommendations

Recommended By
Alan Smithee
burlegoat
D. Long
isopatch
locogringo

and 3 more members

   of 793813
 
Well, I took a minute to glance at the suit. It presents only a question of law, i.e., whether the defendant States violated the Constitution by having the rules changed by their respective executive officers rather than by their Legislatures?

Damn, that’s clever. No real fact-finding required. No claim of fraud being litigated. A simple yes or no answer that I think the Court can readily handle if it gets past standing.

Very, very interesting.

I lost a bit of my skepticism but still think it is an uphill battle.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News