2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum

GLD 378.38

+2.7%

Nov 10 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: carranza2 who wrote (166093)	12/17/2020 12:34:37 PM
From: TobagoJack	Read Replies (1) of 217666

You are correct, that the trend, if true would be disturbing. However, WSJ is doing the WSJ thing, and it is making up or otherwise twisting stories, so not to worry. WSJ mistaken or deliberated set certain actions as command economy, and other tales as policy. It is wrong on both count. But then again it has been wrong on China China China for far too long, set in WSJ-ways. Safe to ignore, and as safe to ignore as the too often and regularly featured ‘China banking problem’, especially as the problem going fully digital and be more efficient at doing what it is supposed to do, a utility provider, as opposed to being viewed through any lens familiar to WSJ. The private sector in China are resilient because it is resilient, born into a storm and only the resilient survive. Please do shout as and when there be any particular question arise and I shall detail as viewed from where I sit.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next