Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

Recommended by:

Thehammer

To: LindyBill who wrote (737130)	1/8/2021 6:11:41 PM
From: kckip	1 Recommendation of 793896

Completely agree! But those are interim appointments only (240 days?) and he would have needed to keep after it. Likely, as an outsider, he was listening to "advisors" and selecting permanent appointments who were plants. Looks like Obama's recess apptments forced this issue to the SCOTUS in 2014 and limitations were put on....10 days of adjournment. This is really on McConnell's head and anyone who grants him the slightest bit of slack over this is Uniparty dung. During PDJT's entire term, no House or Senate adjournments were enacted.....specifically for this reason; Senate adjournment is primary. dailysignal.com First of all, the Constitution does allow the president to temporarily fill what it calls “Vacancies that may happen during the Recess of the Senate” without Senate approval. Trump could do that if the Senate was in a single extended recess—if it was adjourned.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next