You are wrong on that point with respect to most of the dozens of cases filed. You are correct on a few, but procedure and standing matter in the law. They aren't just convenient vehicles by which courts/judges can further some conspiracy to avoid issues before them.
You should do some reading of the actual opinions after reading the actual pleadings, including the actual "affidavits." Consult with someone who understand the law, admissibility of evidence (hearsay, speculation, lack of qualifications to offer testimony, etc.), standards of proof, constitutional 'standing' requirements, procedure and practice. The suits were meritless, the affidavits were pathetic, and the dismissals should have resulted in monetary sanctions (and some may still).
Unfortunately, I've shot my wad on the topic trying to help folks through the legal issues and why the effort Trump and his crew made failed, and rightfully. You'll have to do the work yourself if you are really interested in the truth.
That's all I have to say on the subject. I was scanning this board this morning and noticed your misstatement of the standard of proof on the claims. My apologies for butting in, but now that you have the actual measure of proof identified, and you can do a little research to understand what that measure actually requires.
There's little room for argument on the topic when looked at with an objective, informed, and experienced eye. |
