Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

Recommended by:

To: Real Man who wrote (738945)	1/24/2021 2:52:28 AM
From: i-node	9 Recommendations of 793781

Just over 100k votes across PA and MI were the difference between winning and losing. Or various other combinations of states. You have to keep in mind how the theft occurred. It was not voting machines. It was mail-in voting which is not secure. The key element is this: dumping partisan observers. Once that is done, ballots become what officials want them to be. There is no one to challenge them. Mail in ballots must be challenged within the seconds following the opening of the envelope, or never at all. That is important. Because to challenge the mail in ballot a Republican has to be there. Not outside. Not 30 feet away. He has to be able to inspect the ballot and AGREE or DISAGREE with its contents. Within a few seconds the envelope is gone and the origin of the ballot can never be determined. These ballots, hundreds of thousands of them, should have been disqualified. But judges understood that they couldn’t do that. You’re going to throw out good votes because you don’t know which ones are bad? Trump's lawyers knew that was a non-starter. It was all over but the shouting. BUT NO LESS A THEFT. It was possible because Zuckerberg came into Michigan and setup “satellite” offices where people could vote, but because they’re “satellites” instead of “polls”, they got around having observers present. It was violating the intent of the law, but under special “Covid” procedures dreamed up after David Plouffe's book in March. Slick, nasty and effective. Typical Democrat ballot box stuffing operation.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next