SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
SI - Site Forums : Silicon Investor - Welcome New SI Members!

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Susan Saline who wrote (332)2/1/1998 6:35:00 PM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell  Read Replies (1) of 32882
 
Re: Titles and one-line posts

Susan, let's not overthink the problem. I doubt people will take the time to add titles to a post that is only a few words anyway. I just thought it might be a convenience to be able to skip over situations like the following:

#100 - Anyone know when earnings will be announced?
#101 - My broker told me this Tuesday.
#102 - I called Schwab and they said a week from Monday.
#103 - Who cares. Earnings will suck anyway.
#104 - Schwab never gets earnings days right.
etc.

If messages #100-#104 had some sort of end-of-message mark then one could avoid clicking on them.

Actually, as I have a cable modem, I click on everything since response time is instantaneous. However, I do read many threads and do skip over a good many posts, so knowing there might be more content inside might sway me to consider reading the rest of it.

Perhaps, as someone alluded to here, Brad had the right idea in the Clubhouse by adding a "More" tag at the end. So, in this case, no tag means a one-line message. I'm more inclined to see a "+" sign to indicate there's more to read. If you really want to get technical, then a much longer post might get a "++" sign, etc.

Did I just say we shouldn't overthink the problem? (gg)

- Jeff
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext