SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Doo who wrote (466383)1/27/2021 1:28:20 PM
From: cosmicforce  Read Replies (1) of 540755
 
As a hard data scientist with a geophysics and computer science background - the law seems capricious and inconsistent. I read a while back something like 30% of the hyperlink references in federal court documents are broken - in the past, law references rarely broke because there were well-managed copies and for-fee private digital archives. The internet has made people lazy - and the courts should ding themselves on their poor record keeping. There appears to be no program for central stewardship of case work or evidence used in decisions. If a case is important enough to be in a brief, then it should be stored in the Library of Congress or some other repository and the court should not accept it until it is. I imagine something like the "Internet Wayback Machine" archive.org. But there are pointers to defunct libraries - Cornell or other universities - that are no longer valid.

Imagine if geologists forgot Mt. St. Helens was a volcano or computer scientists forgot about the properties of logic? That level of incompetence is self-correcting in science.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext