SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials
AMAT 220.28-6.4%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Teri Skogerboe who wrote (15200)2/2/1998 3:07:00 AM
From: Paul V.  Read Replies (1) of 70976
 
Teri,> No, I'm not sure how in the world you could read that into my posts. I see absolutely no rational evidence for a rally in the semi-equips during '98. We have over-capacity on the supply end of things and an economic "crisis" in Asia where alot of high-tech growth/demand was going to originate.<

Based on rational data I totally agree with you. However, in 1996 we all saw the earnings go down while the price began to move up. Then in July, Aug, 1997 when the EPS was up we saw the price go down. I believe when there is a sufficient runup Wall Street just decides to take profits and sells off giving the appropriate rationale to justify their behavior.

Teri, if you look at Friday's IBD you will see that the semi-equip industrial ranking is 197 out of 197. There is only one way to go-up! Every indicator I look at seems to be pointing up for approximately the next 3-6 months. Am I wrong in what I am seeing? Big Buck, Kumar, Tito, etc. what are your thoughts?

Paul V.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext