rob...
people here try to draw you out,
not give you a hard time; i agree
with aj.
if someone takes you to task, it is
because you are well versed, and
exactitude is what we all would like.
certainly, no one would want to homogenize
the thread, and noone would like to dampen
your posting.
i sense that aj is drawing on his not dissimilar
experience with idti and he finds few to engage
in meaningful debate. the latitude between you
appears to be one of perspective: aj (please jump
in anytime..) has hinted at a core transition in idti
making it impervious, to some extent, to both historical,
and consequently TA analysis. his emphasis is this
may be a case of first impression, regardless of cyclical
point patterns of the past.
the marked volume increases compunded by fundamental
shifts at the company create a uniquely new promise in the
stock, one which may not be deciphered by old methods
because old methods necessitate drawing a comparison with
the "old" idti.
ok, aj, now, please tell me how presumptuous i've been.
and then, please share what you think tomorrow will bring;) |
