I am a scientist, first... so I do know the difference between "science" and "a PR campaign"...
And, as it happens, I was also included in the discussions when they came up with the plan to advance it as an argument. I advised against it... even pointing out that known cyclical behavior meant they'd only have ten years of support in the data trends... and then the data would turn against them. So, if they didn't "win" the policy change they wanted inside that window...which was unlikely... then it would probably never happen.
So, when the data turned against them... they just starting lying about the data... cooked it in all sorts of ways... only some few of which have been made painfully obvious in public as "deliberate". Rather than admit being wrong... they found it a better idea to proceed blindly to corrupt the foundation, the institution and the idea of science... to bend it to support their political agenda... no matter what the facts required.
The biggest impact of global warming fraud over the next generation... will result from the destruction of the integrity of the foundation, the institution and the idea of science. They broke science... made it a lie, first... and then made it a religion... as if it doesn't matter to our future, at all, whether science is based in and seeks truth... or if it just makes stuff up as it goes...to prosecute an agenda... while insisting people must believe in it... whatever it is they say... and treat it as gospel... or be blacklisted if they speak truth instead of the supporting the narrative ?
The reality in the science... is that there is so much more we don't know about forcing in the climate than there is that we do... but we know a whole lot more now than we did back then... and most of what we've learned discredits the whole idea. Where the solar system is, as the sun travels through space towing us along with it... wasn't something people even thought about when they launched this scheme. Today, we know that the sun is not "static" in its influence... but has massively larger influence on us than we ever thought... and we know more about how changes in the sun's output alter our own experience... by altering the induction of earth's magnetic field... raising or lower our shields, if you will. But, we also know that space isn't uniform in the way we used to think it must be... and what happens if the solar system is shielded from cosmic radiation by traveling through dense clouds of dust... and what happens if we emerge from a dust cloud and are exposed to more radiation from deep space... has huge impacts on the sun, altering its output... but also direct impact on the earth... on top of the impact resulting from changes in the sun. All of those things have way more impact than variation in the CO2 concentration... while climate history now shows CO2 has tended to result FROM warming, rather than being the cause of it.
That all being true... has nothing to do with the agenda... so, they just keep lying more and more... while refusing to admit the truth... Science, today, in result... as that corruption has spread... now has about the same credibility in every subject where politics imposes orthodoxy, as the Catholic church had in debunking Galileo and Copernicus...
Really... hydroxychloroquine, Ivermectin and other proven effective treatments... have no impact on the virus... you have to not take them... we won't let you... and you have to get a vaccination when we tell you to... because "science"...
It's all bullshit... and its all driven by corruption driving flows of money to the most corrupt...
When the "global warming" campaign began... they were claiming that the sun had no impact on climate... that solar output doesn't vary. meaningfully... etc. The reality of the variance from that expectation... alone... dwarfs the relevance of every bit of "evidence" they have "supporting" CO2 driving global warming... and dwarfs it by an order of magnitude.. So, having emerged from a dust cloud... we're exposed to more cosmic radiation now... as the sun has quieted down... so our magnetic field has dropped... and no longer protects us from the cosmic radiation. In result... the planet is warming up... from the inside... while from the surface we radiate more heat into colder space...driving a colder surface along with an increased volcanism... which as it continues to increase... will drive enough SO2 into the atmosphere... that it puts us into an ice age...
Global warming... causes ice ages. So "the science" says now... but, that's not gospel either... because science doesn't really do "truth" instead of theory... and the faster we learn... the more our best guess about how things really work will change, too.
I'm not a "skeptic" about global warming... because I know the science, and know the truth of its origin... as a fraud... driven by corruption... to scam people out of money. But, as "science"... the only utility in "global warming driven by CO2" is in studying cognitive science... and behavioral science... the madness of the crowds... and the sociopaths who seek to control them... and those far too eager to go along, or who lack the courage to speak the truths they know.
Otherwise, I'm perfectly happy to have people disagree with me... and try to prove me wrong... which has happened once or twice... but doesn't happen often... because I'm usually more rigorous in testing my own ideas than others tend to be. But, i might get caught being too lazy once in a while ?
This isn't a global warming discussion group... but, that aspect of "truth" versus "lies" and the lying liars lying them... is pretty much the same thing as is controlling the global economy and the banking system... so useful to understand that... its all about fraud employed in service of corruption... same shit, different day. |
