He's an ex-President, with two or more gift deals with Netflix. But he has no marketing or development ability.
He is close to fading away in one more term.
The unfair use of the USA PATRIOT ACT name, and calling a program PATRIOT ACT is why I cancelled Netflix, and I won't go back no matter how many times they give me the first month free.
I don't like boycotts, because they're un-American. Anyone trying to keep employees hired or suppliers active or retirees getting income deserves the right to be competitive and to develop new, innovative products or services.
But if the business model is to be antiTrump or anti-USA, then I won't.
If the messaging is pro-Soros or pro-Davos, or anti-consumer, I'm against. I'm against CDA Section 230. I think the consumer owns his data, before Facebook, Google, Alphabet, and even Apple. Steve Jobs owned the data, Tim Cook does not. Ruth Porat came from Morgan Stanley, and does not. Consumers have been disadvantaged by Google, Facebook, and Apple; and they interfered with the election dissemination and counting.
The view not seen at other places is how the votes were switched from 4-6 countries. We knew what happened, and Pence made an illogical choice (AFAIK). The information will still come out, still will get worse and worse for Joe and Hunter Biden. |
