SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Investment Chat Board Lawsuits

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: FBN MarCom who wrote (12356)2/19/2021 4:40:12 PM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell1 Recommendation

Recommended By
SI Dave

  Read Replies (2) of 12465
 
The Constitution says *Congress* shall shall make no law (abridging the freedom of speech, etc.). Again, this applies to the government, not individuals. Don't want your kids to swear? Don't want anyone rooting for the Cowboys? Asking them to "stfu or get out" it is not a violation of the Constitution. Heck, there are even types of speech that Congress can indeed limit anyhow (e.g. obscenity, fraud, etc.).

For some reason these days, people are incorrectly equating our given freedoms with anarchy not democracy. Democracies are all about the right of the majority to limit the rights of the minority; simple as that. Yes, you have the right to protest in a democracy, and perhaps change people's minds, but if the majority wants to tax you in a certain way, decide what is a crime and what is not, such is life. In fact, even what is considered to be "unacceptable" speech is determined by the majority.

In sum, no, the Constitution does not force someone to allow you to spout whatever nonsense you like. "No shirts, no shoes, no service" is indeed Constitutional. I'm as big a proponent of free speech as anyone out there, but I'm not a fan of anarchy.

- Jeff
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext