SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Anything graphite based, CCB, Zen and hopefully much more.

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: the Chief2/19/2021 6:45:04 PM
  Read Replies (1) of 2618
 
I am not, once again, being critical of ZENs potential. I, at this point, believe the stock is not worth $3.00+ and in fact believe 2.87 is the peak.

I base this on my experience (regretable ones) with hyped BioTechs, which ZEN now is.
You will note that ZEN has not come out and told anyone on the ZEnners board that the INK could not be possibly approved, even if fast tracked before the beginning of 2022.

There is good reason for that, Zenners just have not figured it out yet.

BUT, when the INK is approved, (if approved) it will be a far better business than pretending you are a rubber band augmenting company.

So, longterm INK approved, I could see $6.40.
Shortterm with PH1,2,3 ahead of you and mouse trials being just that, MOUSE TRIALS!, I see 2.20-40 as the low $2.87 as peak.

So I do not have to reiterrate my short points again

If stock reaches 3.52 ish I short 3.50
If the stock then falls and reaches 3.32 I add to short or cover totally based on whether I am short at 3.50 or not and wait to see if it bounces or continues to fall.
If the stock closes below 3.14 then the short is 3.08-3.10 with a cover of 3.16 if it changes direction.
If I am short at 3.32 then I cover 3.07 because of the "expected bounce to 3.15 or maybe higher.
These numbers do not change no matter what ZEN says or what any other poster says, because ZEN is now a BIOTECH.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext