SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Trump Presidency

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
Recommended by:
CentralParkRanger
To: i-node who wrote (194679)2/23/2021 6:53:49 PM
From: Lane31 Recommendation  Read Replies (2) of 355645
 
But the Supreme Court has the right and responsibility to strike it down whenever it is challenged.

Not until the case gets to it. The case never got that far. The SC doesn't just pop in here and there whenever it finds something in the news or the grapevine that makes it itch. Doesn't work that way. There's a process.


Or when a voter moves from one place to another?


When I moved from VA to NC the states made the change without my having to take action in VA. There was obviously a process in place.


There is an essential requirement that the "persons" on the list are the same persons who vote.


You obviously have to have some mechanism to verify that the party who signed the ballot is the same one to whom it was sent. There may be a few breaches that don't get caught, where the party for whom the ballot was intended does not notice his ballot is missing, but they occur in onsies and twosies, not enough to change an election.

There is a difference between design and execution. We were talking design. WRT execution, that's another matter.


I appreciate your sincere belief that the election was won, fair and square, but there simply is scant evidence to support that claim.


No, you are being unreasonable. The elections were run and they were certified by the appropriate officials. The default is that the officials acted in good faith until and unless somebody shows otherwise. Occam's Razor.


If you were in my place perceptively, you would be furious that no proof has been produced of Biden having won the election.


I would be no such thing. I am a rational operator living in the real world.

Edit:

In that 3-4 cities that produced the couple hundred votes that decided the elections, I would guess at this point there is ZERO evidence.

Earlier you were criticizing someone for innumeracy, although you used some other term. Well, look at yourself. It's absurd that a particular set of votes from this city decided an election any more that a set from another city or a few votes each from a couple of hundred small towns. Surely you know better. Votes are fungible.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext