SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : FAMH - FIRAMADA Staffing Services

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Brad who wrote (2346)2/2/1998 2:58:00 PM
From: Wayne J.  Read Replies (1) of 27968
 
Good Day! Brad,

In one of your recent FAMH postings you shared an FAMH GENERAL "OVERVIEW".

I find these updates that you share with us both informative, and also reinforces to me that you are looking at FAMH as a long term opportunity! ( Just my opinion).

Am I surprised that Ira is starting to sound a little less cheerful then some of us would like to see ? That's a possability!!!!!

I have a hunch that at least one reason for Ira's recent apparent growing frustration, may very well have something to do with the fact that it appears that he has openly recognized that there is an FAMH Thread, I feel has attempted to openly communicate on a regular basis, addressing several questions raised on this thread ( In fact to me it would seem to be that several people are asking the same questions repeatedly?)---That is certainly anyone's and everyone's perogative to do so!

In my opinion the way I read it is that Ira several days ago suggested he might be able put his time to bettor use if this thread could agree on an FAMH Thread spokesperson, let Ira know who that Spokesperson was, and have him or her kept in direct contact with Ira, fielding the questions and concerns of this thread!

From what I personally have felt that is currently taking place is quite simply an errosion of individuals well thought out opinions! The challenge that I see is that both the negative, positive and neutral positions, being expressed ,many seem to be of the firm force variety!

That's OKAY! But, what ever happened to our spokesperson!

I made a recommendation! Then a few naysayers jump in , created quite a flurry, got everyone off topic ( of selecting a n FAMH Spokesperson!)---and achieved their less than positive result!

Why do individuals that apparently to not have a vested interest in FAMH, spend so much time and energy, in attempting to keep this thread off the main purpose for having an FAMH Thread Spokesperson, that could achieve an ongoing regular communication flow, with an FAMH Management representative, and then report back their findings to this thread in a timely manner!

My compliments to those thread participants that have done an adequate job in "Bamboozling" us at least temporarily!

In efforts to get us back on the information track, and regain some of Ira's confidence with us! ( Yes! I know, he is accountable to the FAMH Shareholders, but at the same time try to put yourselves in his shoes? Think he might have some pressure on him to perform?
Let's get with the program!---Does anyone out there have a clue how much time these efforts take to show results?

Participants on this thread have recently, hounded, badgered, constantly remind us that it's an OTC B.B. stock, then a sarcastic tone or style creeps in shortly behind the sarcasim, in my opinion, efforts to discredit the efforts that FAMH Management is making!

Let's get on with the program! OKAY! Now! Brad! Would you be kind enough to be the FAMH Thread Spokesperson, and inform Ira of that fact so that he can refocus the little time he does have to spare in answering shareholder questions?

I wouldn't pay to much attention to the naysayers ( that's their perogative)-- plus they do not seem to be the one's providing tomuch feedback from their discussions with FAMH Management)

I do find it interesting that their comments towards the FAMH management is less than flattering, yet they continue to drive negative inuendo's on this thread! What is their Motivation or Objective in doing so???? I think that I have an idea, but since in my opinion they have crossed a line, I do not care !
Brad! In my opinion you would make an excellent FAMH Spokesperson!

And I am not going to mention another 10 people who would also make excellent Spokesperson's, because if I do that then we will just Go Around The Merry Go Round One More Time! And we'll be addressing the same growing frustrations two weeks from now!

To start the process Brad you are my FAMH Spokesperson representative, when you talk to FAMH Management you know that I am on your side, and I will patiently wait for you to share any information on this thread! Youcan tell FAMH Management that Wayne J. will not be directing any further calls to NYRR Management as long as you are the FAMH Spokesperson! ( Or until I decide otherwise!)

This is just a recommendation but it might be worthwhile for anyone else that is in agreement with me that Brad, be our Thread Spokesperson, to just make a short posting on this thread, to give Brad some idea how many FAMH Thread participants that he is representing when he talks to FAMH Management?

In closing, Brad, I appreciate all your previous efforts in sharing your research on FAMH, as well as your efforts in the future!

Best Regards,

Wayne J.

P.S Brad! I realize that you still have to agree to this!
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext