| | | the current system does not permit a proper challenge for a stolen presidential election.
That's true. There really isn't any practical way to do so beyond recounting votes given the time constraints. Which is why we have to be really, really careful to do them right so that we can automatically accept the outcome. And automatically accept the outcome regardless.
you don't have to win, all you have to do is convince people you won, as no legitimate challenge to the findings will be permitted.
That works both ways. You don't have to win, all you have to do is claim, without evidence, that you won and get your cult members to back you. That doesn't get you the win. It just despoils the system and destroys the country.
The USSC slammed the door shut, even before state courts had allowed any examination of the evidence in hand. It was pathetic.
The judiciary lives in the real world, not Trump world.
One would think you would have figured out by now, given no backing from outside your special world, that you've been operating off of faux premises.
Believe it or not, I actually have a full-time job and other responsibilities that prevent me from spending much time on court cases, other than the most essential.
If you had not spent so much time and energy barking about wild, outlandish kraken claims and focused on the critical areas you would have knowledge of tender points. |
|
