2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum

GLD 368.29

+0.6%

Nov 7 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: TobagoJack who wrote (170095)	4/1/2021 9:37:38 PM
From: sense	Read Replies (2) of 217592

I think yours uses very appropriate language... Issues in dimensions... What is the show? Hang on, going to look... Counterpart... Anyway... matter - anti-matter and black holes with divergent dimensions... all in the right galaxy. But, Occam's Razor always there nagging... That you don't see it or understand it doesn't mean it doesn't make sense to someone with a different view... or perhaps you if you take a different view... but it may be harder to see than it is for others if only you don't share the same principles and purposes in what you or they deem to be of benefit... I will start with the assumption that the objective is always to survive and grow the stack... without enabling risks of the opposite that are outside rational control... although the ethic inherently being "I survive and grow my stack"... with the rest being left for others to debate with Ayn Rand or Niccolo Machiavelli, as the mood strikes... The elements beyond that... in the inevitable in the flow of events in time as related to choices made in 1929 or 1932... or in 1971... or 2001... or 2008... are always elements that cannot be altered. The time arrow isn't irrelevant... the events not obviated by time rather than fixed by it as both "fact" and "lessons learned" (or not)... but that element is not up for re-negotiation... What we control is our choices now... so solutions have to be found in the set of choices we can make now... given what the time arrow dictates. I don't accept that the choices are... detached and irrational... only "unresolved"... So, when you finish the puzzle except for that set of missing pieces... rather than continue looking for pieces someone has removed on purpose to make it more confusing... I will proceed to seeing "what fits" to fill the gaps optimally... and make better sense of the whole that was not obvious before, while proceeding that way...

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next