Mike Winn...
Although I usually detest wasting my time (and everyone else's) by responding to flippant comments and childish harassment, I feel that I need to make some comments directed to the thread in general and to you in particular.
Please note that there is a world of difference between useful, constructive criticism and useless detracting commentary interjected with "ARF ARF" and "hic hic". I have been following this thread for quite a while longer than you and have seen many different points of view and personality types pass through it. You are not the first person to question, well, everything. However, if you really were interested in this stock, and therefore the company as a whole, you would have done much more quiet DD (a phrase that is WAY overused). Instead, as soon as you appeared you wasted much bandwidth and time sounding off to anyone who would listen. If you didn't drown out everything with the sound of your own voice, you would have realized that the bulk of the people on this thread really care about what the true picture of this company is. Most people have real money, not "play" money invested in TAVA's future and have therefore researched it as much as possible. These people have worked hard to not only create and refine a realistic model of TAVA, but have gone to great pains to provide that information to others.
SI is, in my view, an investment tool. It provides people with the opportunity to pool knowledge and experience in the investing / trading world. As an engineer, I know you understand the importance of selecting your toolset carefully, and maintaining it so that it performs reliably. Unfortunately there are some people, such as yourself, who enjoy ruining the integrity of such a forum through statements crafted to elicit a response (like this one) rather than to enhance the body of knowledge.
I, like many others on this thread, welcome downside information, it is analogous to the legal shorting of an equity. It gives stability to the information. That is NOT what you bring to the table, and that is why your motives, even qualifications, are suspect.
With that said, my next post will try to describe TAVA's Y2K CD / methodology, in response to your earlier, accusatory post to jan mccabe.
exchange2000.com
JohnnyH |
