SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Trump Presidency
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Ron who wrote (197990)4/4/2021 10:46:33 PM
From: combjelly  Read Replies (1) of 356072
 
You wouldn't know that the courts listened if you get your information from Fox News, OAN, Newsmax and/or Epoch Times. There you just heard that the cases were thrown out on "technicalities" and not on merit. You certainly didn't hear about the lawyers, when asked about evidence, essentially say "we got nothing" and "we can't vouch for the veracity of what we have". Now, not having any evidence is a technicality, but without context it can be played as they didn't dot an 'i' or maybe got a date wrong. Just look at i-node's various posts on the subject. He just mentions the cases where there was no standing. But that wasn't the only reason why cases were thrown out. In many of them, the lawyers had to admit they had no evidence. They had signed affidavits, but no confidence there were accurate.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News