| | | The Rantings of a Tschandala
Posted on April 8, 2021 by Baron Bodissey
Our Israeli correspondent MC explores the historical roots of 21st-century Wokism.
The rantings of a Tschandala
by MC
“The fate of our times is characterized by rationalization and intellectualization and, above all, by the disenchantment of the world.”
“Precisely the ultimate and most sublime values have retreated from public life either into the transcendental realm of mystic life or into the brotherliness of direct and personal human relations.”
? Max Weber
I am in my 70th year. I was born in 1951, the year the King died.
For most of my life we have been in the post-WW2 ‘hot’ peace — Korea, Suez, Aden, Cyprus, Israel, Vietnam, Malaysia (I was there), Israel, Oman, Northern Ireland (I have the medal for this one), Falklands, Bosnia, Kosovo, Iraq, Afghanistan, Iraq, Yemen and probably more in India, Pakistan, Burma/Myanmar, Nicaragua, Guatemala, Grenada, Angola, Mozambique, Rhodesia/Zimbabwe.
But only now do I get shivers down my spine as the moderating hand of Western Civilization circles the plughole prior to disappearing down the drain.
The long struggle to remove slavery from the equation, to deliver some degree of liberty to all and sundry is in the process of failing, failing because Karl Marx and his sponsors did not like mere Christianity.
It is no accident that civilization and Christianity have walked hand in hand. Here in Israel we are celebrating Pesach (Passover) in memory of the time in which Yahovah brought His people (and a lot of Egyptians — the Mixed Multitude) out of slavery and into a new land.
Tomorrow is Bikkurim, the festival of first fruits, signalling the end of Matzos (Unleavened Bread) and the beginning of the counting of the Omer leading up to Shauvot (Pentecost).
I am a biblical fundamentalist. I start at the beginning of the book, not the middle, and that is the difference. Christianity is the religion of Constantine, an amalgam of the religions of Rome in the third century; Mithras, Celebe, Dagon and Jesus amongst others, but based on the Ten Commandments of the Jews.
It is those ten commandment that led to the enlightenment and to the industrial revolution, and above all, to contract law and legal systems which made farming and commerce (and mining/drilling) — and therefore manufacturing — viable. A law applicable both to rulers and the ruled.
For the first fifty years of my life, these things seemed set in stone, but Marx had set in motion a set of forces that put man’s commandments above God’s commandments. The leaven of the Pharisees 2: intellectuals know best!
Under Marxist theory, the rules only apply to the ruled; the elite can do as they please. This used to be called Feudalism, but Marx picked it up, cleaned and polished it and rebranded it under new management — bold, sexy and utopian.
No churches, no priests, no landlords, everybody equal — just commissars and apparatchiks ‘caring’ and sharing their superiority (with the help the odd persuader or two)….
We all know how that worked out, it was later revamped as Fascism (Statism) and then as Nazism (Leader {Fuhrer} Worship). It is a little-known fact that the Nazi Party did not sign the 1945 surrender document; only the military did. Thus the government did not surrender as such, and Nazism did not die, it relocated, it morphed into something maybe even more deadly. But that’s ‘conspiracy theory’.
Whereas Communism is self-limiting and tends to self-destruct, Nazism is much more persistent and appears to be what a large proportion of the population want(ed). Just don’t call it Nazism. Call it ‘Wokism’ or progressivism or Liberalism.
There were always two levels of Nazism. Let’s call them the (practical) ‘Hitler level’ and the (emotional) ‘Rosenberg level’.
At the Hitler level was a pragmatic ‘lets make IT happen’ ideal where IT was a renewal of Germany and all things German, including German Socialism. Socialism was born in Germany. Marx was German, as was Engels. It was from Germans that Lenin learned his socialism. The German Social Democrat party was an example to the world in the last decades of the 19th century. Consider this:
“Let us consider the actual, worldly Jew — not the Sabbath Jew, as Bauer does, but the everyday Jew. Let us not look for the secret of the Jew in his religion, but let us look for the secret of his religion in the real Jew. What is the secular basis of Judaism? Practical need, self-interest. What is the worldly religion of the Jew? Huckstering. What is his worldly God? Money. Very well then! Emancipation from huckstering and money, consequently from practical, real Jewry, would be the self-emancipation of our time… We recognize in Jewry, therefore, a general present-time-oriented anti-social element, an element which through historical development — to which in this harmful respect the Jews have zealously contributed — has been brought to its present high level, at which it must necessarily dissolve itself. In the final analysis, the emancipation of the Jews is the emancipation of mankind from Jewry.”
Which German wrote these words? Hitler? Goebbels? Himmler? Goering?
None of the above?
Try Karl Marx…
Hitler was a revivalist. He took a Germany shattered by four years of war and semi-starvation, and a run on the currency which evaporated the middle class, and he gave them renewed hope.
Alfred Rosenberg was the party theorist. He came from different roots. Throughout the history of the Nazi red-green movement was a ‘spiritual’ thrust which gave ‘wings’ to the movement. The Wandervogel, the Thule and the Vril were mystical occult-religious forces that shaped the Third Reich. Hitler was a relative newcomer to this spiritual ‘Dark Side’, but he was a wonderful exponent of one aspect of it, that of ‘presence’. His command of the lectern was most profound and mesmerising. From this lectern he could propound the most egregious aspects of race theory, and people would believe it.
On the surface Nazism was caring and sharing, but beneath the glam was a crusher of minds, a national insanity, a social dementia.
Wokism is exactly the same, as is Islam its close neighbour.
To a Wokist, Wokism is the only way. One must be nice to everybody, but to be nice one must enforce ‘niceness’, and only when all the world is nice will ‘niceness’ work. To enforce ‘niceness’ I must fight un-niceness wherever I find it, hew its neck, cut it off. Cancel it.
The very rocks will cry out, there is an un-nicer behind me, oh wokista, come, kill him.
Sadly, in my lifetime, the society into which I was born, a society just a few years removed from a holocaust of warlord-inspired mayhem, has gone, ‘never again’ slowly became ‘maybe again’ and slowly, ‘now again’, when an even more virulent form of the old Nazism came out from under the rocks and proceeded to win the peace.
Adorno and Marcuse were German atheists of Jewish origin, similar to Marx. Between them they recast German Socialism into an acceptable form, and managed to separate the old Hitlerian socialism from the much more sinister Rosenbergian socialism. Cultural Marxism/wokery is basically Rosenberg on steroids.
Wokism is in effect a new invocation of the Nazi ‘supernatural imaginary’. In the Nazi/Rosenberg context this is the idea that what we idealize can be made ‘true’ if we just create space for the ideal to flourish. Hitler was very pragmatic, an opportunist who believed in making his own ‘luck’ as such, but many senior Nazis placed more trust in supernatural forces.
The occult is about ritual, and that if one goes about it the right way, with the right recipe, then one can invoke the supernatural to assist in achieving ones aim’s and purposes. In effect ‘spiritual cookery’.
The New Age theory sees life as dominated by spiritual energy, and each physical action has a parallel spiritual energy transaction that either increases or decreases the individual net level of spiritual energy.
Stuff that decreases my net level of spiritual energy must be cut off. In effect, it must be cancelled before it diminishes me. The more spiritual energy I have, the more likely it is that my wishes become reality.
Now, of course, this is a broad highway to insanity, and to understand the sheer inanity of Wokism we must understand its roots.
Most of Christianity has over the last hundred years compromised its roots in Jewish Scripture, preferring to adopt humanism and a social gospel. Those Christians who stand by the New Testament only are missing three-quarters of their heritage and are thus only weakened.
The problem here being the idea that the Old Testament is no longer relevant, and may thus be overlaid by big bangs and monkeys…
Thus many Wokists really believe that Jesus was also a Wokist, along with the Buddha and Mohammed and Krishna and the other wealth of cultural superheroes (including Superman, Spiderman, Gandhi and Mandela) and that the spiritual leaders of the Democrat Party will lead them to a new safe space throughout all the world.
Wokism is the re-enchantment through socialism and climate activism of a world disenchanted by the loss of Christianity and ‘white’ self-confidence. The political opposition is ‘monsterized’ by orange hair and red baseball caps and a penchant to tell the truth no matter whom it may offend.
Climate science is a ‘border science’ where scientific method has been diminished and compromised by the ‘urgent’ need for action (any action will do, it would seem). So emotionalism and political expediency take primacy over research and careful experimentation.
The Nazi ‘borderline’ science clique accepted these intuitional ‘sciences’ as having as much credibility as science governed by scientific method (Hitler’s ‘Jew science’). Subjects such as astrology and telekinesis, telepathy and radiesthesia were regarded as ‘settled’ consensus science.
It is not that I think that these subjects should not be studied, but they need to be studied by the dictates of scientific method, not political or religious convenience.
There is a danger inherent in mixing opinion and fact to achieve a desired outcome, and that danger was nowhere more vicious than Nazi racial theory and its bastard child, critical race theory. The obsession with equality of outcome means fudging the input as such, so garbage in, garbage out. The civilized world was built by white men. The scientific method mandates that we should look for the reason why, not just make assumptions about skin colour. Personally, I would start with the Ten Commandments and the stability they bring, but that is not acceptable to a clique that seeks to eradicate Christianity, so they have to demonize white male achievement whilst rewriting history (or just ignoring it).
Borderline science is skewed science, ‘science’ with a political or religious purpose, science where the ends must justify the sponsor’s needs. One can legitimately study telepathy — how do flocks of birds all turn at the same time? Exactly what is it that Australian indigenous tribes use to communicate over long distance? Or, closer to home, what is intuition? I remember the day my father died, coming back from a scout meeting around 10pm to see my uncle’s car in the drive, and realizing, on the spot, that it had happened. Telepathy and intuition happen and are worthy of research, but to the cite theory as ‘fact’ is where it gets dangerous.
There is such a thing as ‘White Supremacy’, and, as a corollary, there is white privilege because the culture of the Western world is built around Northern European ‘white’ Judeo-Christian values. If you are not Jewish or Christian, you are going to have problems adapting to Western society, in the same way that I had issues living and working in Saudi Arabia and Bahrain; I had to adapt.
German Ariosophy (wisdom concerning the Aryans) grew alongside theosophy and anthroposophy in the late 19th century, also beside the ever increasing popularity of ‘the occult’ stories of demons, vampires and zombies, encapsulated in things such as Grimm’s fairy tales and Wagner’s ring cycle.
Under Ariosophy, all things Aryan (Indo-European) were considered superior to things Judeo-Christian. The Indian idea of caste gave root to the idea of the Untermensch ( Tschandala): these were the lowest form of humanity and were ‘unteachable’ and thus unable to adapt to the new National Socialist Germany. Marx also designated groups as unteachable — Highland Scots like my grandmother, for example.
Being unable to adapt, Untermenschen had to be forcibly removed from the fatherland, or exterminated.
It is understandable that many miss the historical implications of wokery. Foresight is much more difficult than hindsight, and subject to the risk of ridicule and the accusation of ‘conspiracy theory’, the new smother-everything epithet of leftist intellectual bigotry and patronage. But the names have been changed to protect the guilty, and thus wokery is an embryonic form of false-flag Nazism, which has yet to reach the Wannsee stage but is quickly getting there.
According to Nuremberg testimony, it was the Palestinian Haj Amin al-Husseini who demanded that the Jews be exterminated, and hence Wannsee, and exploring possibilities of genocide, but this testimony is uncorroborated. The Wokists support the Palestinian Authority, the political child of said Haj Amin.
It is difficult for us to understand just what is going on, just as it was difficult for the average German in 1932.
Hitler was a proponent of one of these borderline sciences, that of ‘mesmerism’ which he used to great effect. A description of this may be found in the book The Jew of Linz which documents the possible repercussions of Wittgenstein and Hitler attending the same school in Linz, Austria.
Wokism introduces two new borderline sciences into its supernatural imaginary: climate activism, as mentioned above, and ‘leucophobia’ to pick up a term discussed in GoV comments last week, as well as all the same old anti-American tropes. It also has the tacit support of the current administration.
Is this Nazism in drag?
If so we really need to grope to see what is going on underneath the coverings, if we sit back and wait, an Enabling Act Mark II may well get bipartisan support in a conflicted and enflamed US ‘Reichstag’.
Underestimating the seductive power of the Communist/Nazi/Fascist/Woke/Islamist cult(s) is dangerous. The power the ‘party’ member gets, the sheer animal power, is very addictive. “I’m big, you’re small, I’m right, you’re wrong” to quote the late Roald Dahl ( Matilda).
Power is intoxication. The Royal Navy spent a lot of time and resources teaching me how to use power but not abuse it. By the time I reached the rank of Lieutenant at the age of 23, I had power over the lives of at least 20 other men.
But these cults are not the Royal Navy, and they do not teach control along with the power they imbue. They teach superiority; their society is based on a stratification into ‘members’ and ‘non-members’, each with separate legalities. What they teach is that “the ends justify the means”; that if a “member” succeeds in an assigned task, it does not matter how many “non-members” get hurt.
This creates a hydra-like effect with an infinite number of heads. However, all the time we are obsessed with the heads, we are indulging in futility. Also, we cannot separate the heads from the controlling doctrine; we have to kill the doctrine itself, thus rendering its rewards, both physical and emotional, to its members ineffective and undesirable.
Booze is not ‘poisonous’ except when it is poisonous, and the point at which it become poisonous varies from person to person, race to race, and gender to gender. Most Karens I have met are female, and the politically-orientated ones are very toxic. I have two sisters-in-law who fall into this category. One is over-emotional, barks a lot, but is very loyal. The other one is very clever, but ferociously defensive of her particular cult; she is the classic product of seventies Marcusian sociology from a London University. There is no room in her life for any worldview other than hers.
Both these ladies are intolerant and irrational, they are both hydra heads, ignorant of the fact that they are being ‘controlled’ by the very forces against which they speak so vociferously.
It is this knowledge of good and evil again, the ‘superior’ knowledge that makes us gods, and our egos cling to that godship, but do we ever question whose knowledge is it? The Creator’s, the serpent’s, Adam’s, the woman’s?
Each of the four has its own brand of good and evil but only one is appropriate and efficacious. The woman confesses: “I was deceived by the serpent”. Adam accuses the Creator and the woman of his own folly.
Adam is cast out of Eden because his new knowledge of good and evil makes him incompatible, so we must understand what the knowledge of good and evil of Mohammed/Marx/Hitler does to a Judeo-Christian type of society. These are incompatible belief systems. They cannot co-exist because their root is in an Adamic/serpent assumption of righteousness where the Creator is wrong and the Wokist is right.
Few people outside of Judaism actually study the Old Testament in order to understand what it is that Yahovah is telling us, and even within Judaism, Jewish identity and compliance with Rabbinical thought carry more weight than the actual words of Moses.
Christianity appears to take the words of Paul out of their Old Testament context, and without reference to what Yahoshua (Jesus) is saying. So when in Matthew 5 Yahoshua is telling us that Torah is still valid, Paul in Galatians 2 seems to tell us that it is no longer valid.
The problem here revolves around the meanings of two Greek words: pleroo and nomos.
Nomos means statute, law, and can apply to a “keep off the grass” sign, so its use in Galatians is ambiguous. Is Paul talking about Mosaic nomia or Talmudic nomia (We must never forget he was a Jew writing to the Jew first)? Paul was probably thinking and writing in Hebrew; he tells us that Galatians is badly translated because he is in prison and had to do it himself.
Pleroo is a strange word, it means completed or perfect, but in the sense of a foundation upon which an edifice is to be built like completion of a degree and passing final exams and using the resulting bachelor’s degree for the rest of one’s life. The KJV translates it as ‘fulfilled’, and although not wrong, this fails to address the long-term consequences of the word, allowing Christianity to terminate the idea of Torah at the crucifixion. Thus instead of ‘dogma’ being nailed to the cross, Torah is nailed to the cross instead. Yahoshua thought that the three days and three nights were much more important than the crucifixion event itself. The sign he gives to the Pharisees is not of ‘Good Friday’ but of Jonah in the belly of the big fish (Dagon a.k.a. Satan) and being spat out on a beach surrounded by Dagon worshippers, the ripple effect of which must have been quite profound.
What I am trying to get at here is how pernicious ‘Adam’-based belief systems are, rejecting the Creator’s Knowledge, substituting their own, and that if we tolerate them within our midst, as we have been taught that good Christians do, they will corrode and erode to the point that our society loses identity and becomes just another warlord culture of a small elite enslaving the mass of powerless people. Communism was/is a Feudal system with just the names changed. Islam is a ‘religious’ tyranny of which we have many examples in History, and Nazism is a personality cult tyranny. There is a slight variation in emphasis, but the effects are the same.
Wokism is thus just a reworking of Nazism, which is, in itself a reworking of Communism. If we do not nip it in the bud, then freedom, and the liberty to be free, will take a nosedive into a political acid bath which will strip our culture, our civilization and our ability to make our own decisions from us.
The media should be reporting on the facts of facemasks and lockdowns and allowing us to make our own decisions, but they are not. They report the opinions of people with vested interests instead, and as a consequence, more people are eventually going to die than will ever, ever die from Corona itself, because governments and globalists are forcing their scientifically compromised decisions on us. ‘Consensus Science’ is religion, not science. |
|
