Yes, but women and evolutionary selective pressure takes care of such failures to adapt in eugenics carnage.
Women are worth competing for... but, I think you might somewhat misunderstand their priorities...
A first stab at it... not without some reason... tacked on to the end, here... as the cute/money matrix.
Money seems absent in all the overly defensive counters proffered by women in response to the overly honest crazy hot matrix... this one, for instance, totally derivative, but MENTIONS money while refusing to acknowledge it honestly enough to commit it to the white board...
The Universal Douchebag - Hot Guy Matrix totally whiffs on the joke... and compounds the error by providing another revealing truth about women that we all know is true... as it shows you can compensate for not being as good looking as an 8+ "dating zone" guy... by being MORE of a douchebag... marriage requiring you manage at least a 6.5 up to 8.5 in douch-baggery... that zone overlapping with the Cheater Zone... also revealing... basically admitting that beyond good looks and money... women want what other women also want... and expect you to make them suffer the awareness they're replaceable... or they won't feel wanted just because you come home... most of the time.
Of course, its saying women aren't interested in nice guys at all... unless they're really good looking... but its is obviously masking the douchebaggery scale concerns, in part, as a proxy for money... making the rest of the chart mostly a lie... except for the part about the more of a douchebag / the more wealthy you are... the more women might tend to take it as a licence to be as crazy as they want to be...
Both the women's efforts whiff... because what makes the Hot Crazy scale truly funny... is its absolute and brutal honesty... The women can't match that... since they're stuck on lying to themselves and each other about what it is that they really want... or what they want to want... rather than what they do want... when each point in "emotional availability" comes paired with a particular price range...
Beyond the humor, all the efforts fail in point of fact, of course, because "good in bed" is not a metric...
It's also just not possible to complete a proper analysis of what women claim to value without first accepting the truth presented in the cute/money hypothesis... that having enough money / power tends to remove all other concerns women might have...
While the women's efforts are truthful enough in what they do expose that they don't intend to reveal... what their overly idealized efforts still avoid... is addressing the reality that where you fall on the scale yourself... greatly conditions what your expectations are in what you want of the other sex...
Most women want financial security... all else being subsidiary. Good husband, father, not a total douchebag... good in bed... yada, yada... ad infinitum. Preferences allowing a match is rare enough. Beyond that... other benefits in hotness or emotional availability... but always paired with an at least sufficient level of manliness / douchebaggery to not be dismissed as an obvious cuck... ?
The relativistic reality is that there is a dynamic which depends on the relative positions of BOTH persons on the metrics in the relevant charts ? Who is hotter ? Which of the two persons is otherwise more desirable than the other ?
And, only then, once the basic attraction and compatibility issues are resolved... and after the social dominance factors in the relationship relativity matrix calculations are complete... can you also begin to introduce the idea of who is smarter...
Bottom line... if she's hotter than you are... and is otherwise not fatally flawed to the point of being defective in some other metric... it probably means she's also smarter than you are... Smart enough to ensure she remains in control... not just by being better looking... but by controlling you in other ways without you even realizing it... still just leaving you glad to have her ?
The same process just discussed in relation to determining desires in relative values in different forms of currency... probably not too far distant from the process applied in figuring out what you want in a mate ?
Enough fun with socio-biology for one day... ?
|
