The Trump Presidency Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Trump Presidency

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: bentway who wrote (198985)	4/16/2021 1:00:46 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (2) of 362720

>> Well! Clearly it was a good shoot when that lady cop thought she was going to tase him! She instinctively grabbed the correct tool! I think it was a dreadful accident, but the kid should have been acting right. It was an accident, not brutally intentional the way the murder of Ashli Babbitt, which you condone, was. The police officer was required to arrest the man she had stopped. That was not a choice she got to make. He had a warrant for having violated a gun law that Minnesota liberals insisted was important. The law required an arrest. In the process, he takes off in the car, and she is trying to tase him. In an effort to get her taser she accidentally drew her firearm and shot him, thinking it was the taser. There should not even be a trial. This should have been put before a grand jury which should have dismissed it at once as a dreadful accident. The ONLY REASON THAT DIDN'T HAPPEN? The kid was black. She was white. Change either of those things and she would have walked. This is racism on its face. Contrast with the Ashli Babbitt situation where she was harmlessly misbehaving and was murdered by a police officer laying-in-wait for her. The cop goes free. What's the difference?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next