SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
Recommended by:
Mick Mørmøny
To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (1300085)5/11/2021 1:48:29 PM
From: i-node1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) of 1579680
 
>> It's quirky, for sure, but it also cements the role that states play in electing our federal representatives, including the president.

I don't see any way we could ever leave the EC behind. I sure wouldn't want to. But 38 states to ratify is a really tough uphill climb in the best of circumstances.

But ratification to usurp the hard-negotiated protection of red states and give it to CA, NY, IL, MA, and a few others, I just don't see that happening. The arithmetic requires a mix of red and blue states, and I cannot envision red states giving away what was won in The Great Compromise, that which exists solely to protect the small and land-bound states from the predictable growth of the states that border on the seas.

Everyone knew at the time those seaports would end up with the huge metropolis' that would control the direction of the country with a simple direct vote of the people. The Union would never have been formed without it, because you'd have a lot of states that just wouldn't cede independence without a bigger slice of the control.

It was brilliant for the initial red states to hold out for it.

I don't think there is any chance of changing anytime soon. Meaning, in my lifetime ;)
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext