Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

Recommended by:

Bonefish

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1300708)	5/17/2021 12:11:23 AM
From: i-node	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) of 1580442

>> No, Zuckerberg didn't buy the election. That would be illegal. In other news, Trump fucking lost. It may be illegal but the courts let it happen. So, you'll have to figure that out. You cannot possibly argue it wasn't corrupt, and you damned well ought to expect it to breed corruption going forward. Of course, Democrats have the money. (Some of those Dems may be Republicans next time if Biden gets his tax cuts...) You won't argue it wasn't corrupt because you know it was and you know you cannot win that argument. It was improper, the courts allowed it, and it entirely turned the outcome of the election. It is sick as hell. You cannot at once sit there are say, "We aren't corrupt! Zuck didn't buy the election", while at the same time being clearly able to comprehend that is precisely what he did. That's over the top even for a liberal Democrat. Just tell me you would have supported that if Nixon did it in 1969. I don't believe you can honestly make that statement.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next