<<As presciently predicted by me>>
I do not do prescient. I do wild stabbing guesses.
Your guesses are obviously not wild nor stabbing . What you post is a lot of information which you have obviously read and understood. But it's true that all our predictions are wild and stabbing. It's just that some are vastly less willfully wild and stupidly stabbing than others. Prescient predictions, like Schroedinger's cat is only demonstrated AFTER the future has arrived and the box is opened.
I believe we can, with VVV observed, move predictions nearer to prescient and further from wild snd stabbing.
Bumbling, bungling Biden:
Fulfilling his promise to make climate policy a jobs engine won’t be easy.
These days many use the word "bold" when acting on such ideas, as though use of the word bold makes it a good idea rather than a wild, stabbing, very risky, ill-considered, half-witted, lunge for glory.
"Climate change" is not a jobs engine. Pretending that it is gives politicians power to take megstons of opm and destroy it.
If CO2 did turn out to be a problem rather than the great boost to pastures, crops, algae and other plants that it is, then politicians could cut taxes on mobile Cyberspace and other things that produce no or low CO2, and tax CO2 production instead. But that would not be a jobs engine, it would just shift work to Cyberspace from such as digging for gold to turn oil into gold, releasing CO2 in the process.
Paradoxically, Cyberspace has become the CO2 producer with bitcoin miners turning oil into digital gold, as presciently predicted by me back in 2009 when bitcoin was announced. Elon finally figured it out.
Back in 1993, I explained to my good friend that I wanted to cover Australia in photovoltaics. Looks as though that might soon be economically sensible.
Mqurice |
