Sungold Gaming International (SGGNF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Sungold Gaming International (SGGNF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: OPINIONS!!! who wrote (1722)	2/4/1998 1:03:00 AM
From: John Lawrence	Read Replies (1) of 5164

Thanks S.M. for your balanced and realistic perspective. When you think of all the stresses we have had to cope with in holding Sungold shares, the last thing we need is to create more by tussling between ourselves. My apologies to anyone who may have taken offense at my protectiveness of the company and shareholders. My words were not directed at anyone personally. It's just that the negative presence of the shorts and journalists has probably made me overly cautious, perhaps to the point of paranoia. I believe we can all benefit from open discussion. Now that we have passed the initial 30 day period on the Nasdaq OTC-BB, perhaps it isn't necessary to be so careful. Thanks S.M. for pointing out the state of the JV negotiations. I've been staying out of it recently in the belief that since a press release hasn't been issued, the company is still negotiating the contract. Kim pointed out a week or two ago that once this contract is finalized, Sungold will have completed the essential part of its work on the Michigan project. After that the company will have to abide forever with the terms of the contract. I, for one, would rather that the company take its time and get it right.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next