Richard,
I think you better sit down and read my last post to you.. You better start thinking and stop shouting and ranting all over the taotb emailing list..
you know very well that you're paying dearly for the trouble that you've caused. 5 months-6 months ago, you TOLD ME that you would never speak to me ever again. Well, only 3 months ago, you posted on MY stock attack thread and questioned my post on my put/call ratio analysis. (you were right on correcting me, thxs)..
Ever since then, you started taking stabs at me INDIRECTLY. but everyone KNEW it was ME you were referring to. On the taotb list, you called me the INSTANT EXPERT. WEll, i dont really appreciate that Richard. What makes you think that i am an instant expert? Why? Just because i've only done TA for 1 yr? I know that doesn't match your 25 + yr experience, but what makes you have the right to question my analysis and my thoughts? Are my thoughts any lesser than yours? By what measurement are you basing this on? Did it ever cross in your mind that maybe i learn faster than you? Or that i dont need 25 yrs experience to match up to experience? Or maybe I simply just worked harder than you?
What makes you have the right to question my thoughts and analysis?
Let's look at your cheap attacks. Surprisingly, you coming from an Army background, you would choose these "coward "attacks, Where is your honor? Where is your sign of strength?
Regardless, i was on my thread the whole time and posting away my thoughts.. And on the TA -beginner's thread i see this:
dated: Thursday, Jan 29 1998 11:26AM EST
Reply # 7993 of 8026
As for beginners and advanced, in this day of instant experts we see someone with a smattering of knowledge giving faulty TA advice. They move from never seeing a chart a year ago to broadcasting their opinions on market and stock direction here and there. Who is the beginner? who is the advanced?
You were attacking me no doubt. Richard, I AM NOT the insitigator. YOU ARE. what is today's date? today is Feb 3, 1998. As you can see, i let your comments slip by.. I am not the instigator.
Just today, i see WISE remarks from you as well.. coming from your mouth. And of course, my name was mentioned FIRST and thus i have right to reply and find out what is really going on.
Subject: Technical Analysis- Indicators & Systems
| Previous | Next | Respond |
To: Richard Estes (2953 )
From: Sean W. Smith Tuesday, Feb 3 1998 2:58PM EST
Reply # of 2968
Thanks,
I will play with this one.... Or maybe I should ask Chris Chiang first??
Sean
Subject: Technical Analysis- Indicators & Systems
| Previous | Next | Respond |
To: Sean W. Smith (2954 )
From: Richard Estes Tuesday, Feb 3 1998 3:00PM EST
Reply # of 2968
I think we should send all questions to him.
=============
Not wanting to trigger any bad feelnigs, i simple LAUGHED IT OFF and simply asked you if you read my article? No harm no foul!
Subject: Technical Analysis- Indicators & Systems
| Previous | Next | Respond |
To: Richard Estes (2955 )
From: Chris Tuesday, Feb 3 1998 4:51PM EST
Reply # of 2968
hehehe
saw my article?
here is Richard's reply:
Subject: Technical Analysis- Indicators & Systems
| Previous | Next | Respond |
To: Chris (2956 )
From: Richard Estes Tuesday, Feb 3 1998 5:31PM EST
Reply # of 2968
Sounded just like you. High on the "I" word and low on content.
========================================================
A direct attack.. A direct attack coming from the article that i wrote. And this is where i came out retailiating. That is when i am throwing out my "ammo" and questioning your comments..
who givese you the right to call my TA faulty when i have made some good mkt calls while your taotb contest resutls shows less than spectacular results. And do know that, it's not only this time, you've been lagging. Every contest, you have.
Richard, you think you are the best eh? you think your 25 yr expereince SHOULD put you ahead eh? well, to tell you the truth your 25 yrs is just as good as anyone else's -- as long as they put their hard work and efforts into it. You have an ego trip Richard.
When the taotb contest wasn't going your way, you decided to change the rules to make it work for you.
When beginners on the ta-beginner's thread asked you for the dahl formula, you declined and told them to look for yourself. What kind of role model are you Richard? You just wanted the beginner to feel stupid for asking such a question. The beginner would feel uncomfortable in that "your question is TOO EASY to answer, so i wont answer you"
who are you richard? who do you think you are? how is it that you're better than everyone else? You are so CONTRADICTORY, and it shows. You know that email/post where you said you had problems with the "space key"?? well, for your information, in the email to the taotb group, your space bar was working JUST fine on one of the sentences. you go back and look for youself.
And now, you are using scare tactics on the taotb email list? oh boy, they are scared.. what do you think you're going to accomplish by yelling? What do you think you'll achieve? Ending the posting at SI and ending the taotb list will accomplish nothing. Of course, maybe you want the others to "beg you" to stay and continue. "oh no, richard, you are the best. you can't leave".. Is that what you want to hear? To reassure yourself that you are the best?
I'm not scared of you Richard. Emotionally, im 100x stronger than you.. You can try to bully me around, but you know im always one step ahead of you.
Richard.. i picture you as Mike Tyson.. When you're in the boxing ring, your experience shows. You know your TA and it's really admirable. But it's your personality and your view on life that sucks. you think that you're #1 and people will praise you and stroke your ego.. Like Mike Tyson, he self-destructed. A great fighter without a solid mental and emotional side is a LOSER.
face the facts Richard. You are slowly destroying yourself. You are self-destructing under your own will power.
No replies necessary. All that needs to be said has been said. |
