2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum

GLD 368.29

+0.6%

4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

Recommended by:

pak73

To: TobagoJack who wrote (173700)	6/27/2021 11:06:23 AM
From: carranza2	1 Recommendation Read Replies (3) of 217561

Lol! Your post certainly does not read as agnostic. This are my views and the reasons for them. To simplify: The virus exhibits evidence of engineering. That being the case, the fact that it was originally detected within a mile of the known-to-be sloppily-run lab seals it for me. The wet market theory is BS. You won’t find banana trees growing naturally in the North Pole. As far as funding is concerned, the best I can find is circa USD 800K over a period of years from the US. Not much. The running, maintenance, manning, and safety training of lab workers were all in the hands of China. In a word, China operated the lab and is responsible for leaks. China’s post-leak actions were abysmal. Utterly non-transparent. Sorry, I don’t believe a word from Global Times. We are all biased, no one is ever agnostic. I have tried to be as dispassionate as possible in my research, but eventually conclude that the weight of the evidence points to a Chinese pluck-up. Message 33335596 Message 33334218 ncbi.nlm.nih.gov Message 33333786

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next