2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum

GLD 387.98

+1.3%

Nov 28 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: TobagoJack who wrote (173657)	6/27/2021 5:31:00 PM
From: sense	Read Replies (1) of 218108

I think until they're being honest about the response of the virus to... basic proper nutrition... the impact of vitamin D and zinc not in deficit... and the impact of supplementation beyond deficiency to some surplus... the nature of the impact of both preventives and treatments... hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, remdesivir... Where are the studies ? Why are there none... or none being reported ? Given that... Probably a good idea to ignore them... as there's no reason I can see to take what they say as "public health information" rather than "advertising"... or "propaganda". In the degree they think what they are doing is "public health"... it only proves their incompetence... again, not a reason to have faith in them. What they are doing... is NOT "science" or "science based"... but appears almost entirely driven by political or financial motivations... When you know they are lying to you... maybe... don't believe them ? And maybe... don't believe they're only lying about that one thing ? Proper risk analysis... when the mortality rate is well below 1%... and they're not even trying to get basic preventive actions right... like N100 masks vs N95 masks... etc., etc., all making it clear "policy" is about something other than "best practices" ? I'll wait for proof of the need... and efficacy without harm... before getting any vaccine... and, then, only one that addresses a proper target... not the spike protein... and not any mRNA... [the last not because it isn't a valid technology... but only because of proofs you can't trust them... so can't trust them to use it honestly]. But, what we've seen from "officialdom" thus far... induces nothing in or from me but mistrust... Note, I'm not saying "the virus isn't real"... only that their response is not realistic... not viable. So, take care of yourself... manage your own nutrition... keep a stock of N100 masks on hand... since you have no way of knowing if "it's over"... or might be on the cusp of getting worse... if it was just the first shot fired in a still emerging biological war... etc. None of the vaccines thus far... offer benefits that outweigh the risks... IMO. A proper target will tend to work against all variants... without imposing immune system "blind spots" conferring greater susceptibility to future outbreaks... and without the vaccine imposing the same harms the virus itself intends... And, a proper vaccine will confer immunity... not just suppression of symptoms... which fosters an acceleration in the production of variants... making things worse ? I think if you took the public policy response we have seen... and titled it "how not to"... that would be about right.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next