2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum

GLD 393.24

+1.1%

Dec 11 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

Recommended by:

pak73

To: Haim R. Branisteanu who wrote (174331)	7/6/2021 8:11:59 PM
From: sense	1 Recommendation Read Replies (2) of 218431

The issue is that from the many corona viruses floating around somehow one of them developed in not a natural way a spike that is... As far as determining origins... the issue includes that you can't trust any of the bogus "testing" being done to claim this here, that there, on a particular date... without solid proofs of the particulars... that the supposed "tests" are incapable of delivering... "Testing issues" have been a problem throughout the suppression efforts... when mass testing was conducted using inadequate tools... leading to lots of false positives. But, that's not in question, in the issue here, since those tools are totally useless in conducting scientific surveys in relation to origins... which will have to use more robust tools that actually enable real "science" being done... vs political posturing... This virus has mutated many times already since February 2020 when people were forced to become aware of it... If it existed in some form that pre-dated the initial outbreak in Wuhan... you have a series of difficult tests to pass in proving why it became the problem it did only in Wuhan... and just sort of went away in other places it is claimed now pre-dated Wuhan ? So, I don't care about obviously bogus claims about other places "testing positive"... based on bogus tests that don't provide information on anything real or useful in relation to... WHAT virus... which strain... what proteins on the spikes... in each instance. Show there was a virus in Italy in 2019 ? What virus was it ? What was the specific makeup of the protein complement, what was the genetic variation versus others ? Without that sort of information... you have no information that matters... None of that prevents "a" virus from pre-dating the one that became the origin of the Wuhan outbreak ? Others might have been made in lab and released to test them... before the escape or release of the particularly modified virus that is the one that first became a problem in Wuhan ? But, the answers to questions like that... depend on samples showing the ACTUAL VIRUS... with the map of its proteins, etc. And, on it goes... Why was California a hotspot, early on... why a particular spot in Washington State ? Known links to Wuhan in the Washington State instance appear to answer that... but more might be done to tease out the origins in the contacts of those people... Where did they get it, in Wuhan... and from whom ? Were any of the Washington State cluster... associates of the people in the lab there ? Perhaps a lot of that work has been done... to no effect ? If so, we should hear that ? If not... why not ? The efforts I see... are mostly functional only in fostering obfuscation... not illumination.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next